-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add gateway to packet_router_packet_down_v1 #316
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
004904b
to
56386be
Compare
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ message packet_router_packet_down_v1 { | |||
bytes payload = 1; | |||
window_v1 rx1 = 2; | |||
window_v1 rx2 = 3; | |||
bytes gateway = 4; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why add this overhead to every packet headed to the gateway?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, this is an experiment to handle data from Router to HPR with less streams.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Gotcha but it’s also the proto message that the gateway receives right? If so you may want to put the downlink packet in an envelope with the gateway in the outer envelope
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could leave it empty when it goes to gateway
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like that breaks some system boundaries in favor of some optimization. Let’s chat this through before nailing it down
No description provided.