You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This did not improve anything re: GitHub recognizing the license. We still have "Unknown, Unknown licenses found".
I guess this is because GitHub's approach to license recognition uses the Ruby gem https://github.com/licensee/licensee, which will only recognize open licences and CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0 is not regarded as such. So if you pick a license that's not on their list, GitHub says the license is "unknown" 😐
Relevant thread, because someone else here points out that this license is typically required by publishers:
2ed752e
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This did not improve anything re: GitHub recognizing the license. We still have "Unknown, Unknown licenses found".
I guess this is because GitHub's approach to license recognition uses the Ruby gem https://github.com/licensee/licensee, which will only recognize open licences and CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0 is not regarded as such. So if you pick a license that's not on their list, GitHub says the license is "unknown" 😐
Relevant thread, because someone else here points out that this license is typically required by publishers:
licensee/licensee#116
I guess we just have to tolerate GitHub presenting the license as "unknown"?
More relevant links:
licensee/licensee#343
https://github.com/github/choosealicense.com/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md#adding-a-license