test(ctx_test): Fix race condition #3081
Conversation
sixcolors
requested review from
gaby,
ReneWerner87 and
efectn
and removed request for
a team
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe recent changes refine the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3081 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 83.14% 83.12% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 115 115
Lines 8332 8332
==========================================
- Hits 6928 6926 -2
- Misses 1075 1076 +1
- Partials 329 330 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
ctx_test.go (1)
3103-3103: Remove unnecessaryt.Helper()call.The
t.Helper()call is not necessary within thesendFileBodyReaderfunction.- t.Helper()
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- ctx_test.go (4 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
ctx_test.go (1)
3102-3102: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
sendFileBodyReadermatch the new signature.Verification successful
All usages of
sendFileBodyReaderhave been updated to match the new signature.The function
sendFileBodyReaderis correctly used in all instances within the codebase.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `sendFileBodyReader` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'sendFileBodyReader'Length of output: 1152
Refactor the `sendFileBodyReader` function to remove the unnecessary `app` parameter. This simplifies the function signature and improves code readability.
|
@coderabbitai re-review |
|
@sixcolors: I have re-reviewed the changes in the The changes look good and improve the overall quality of the tests. Analysis chainScripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Retrieve the relevant code from ctx_test.go to re-review the changes.
rg 'func sendFileBodyReader' -A 20
Length of output: 36 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for the sendFileBodyReader function with more context lines in ctx_test.go.
rg 'func sendFileBodyReader' -A 50
Length of output: 36 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for all function definitions in ctx_test.go and capture context lines.
rg '^func ' -A 50 ctx_test.go
Length of output: 146304 Actions performedComments resolved. |
* test(ctx_test): Fix race condition * chore: Release ctx resource after sending file * refactor: sendFileBodyReader function Refactor the `sendFileBodyReader` function to remove the unnecessary `app` parameter. This simplifies the function signature and improves code readability.
This pull request fixes a race condition in the
Test_Ctx_SendFile_Compress_CheckCompressedtest in thectx_testfile.