Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat!: add content type encoder and decoder, implement decoder for response consumption #439 #857

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 19, 2024

Conversation

jeevatkm
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@jeevatkm jeevatkm added this to the v3.0.0 Milestone milestone Sep 19, 2024
@jeevatkm jeevatkm self-assigned this Sep 19, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 88.97059% with 15 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 96.39%. Comparing base (d4bc5d3) to head (8fd0645).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
client.go 78.94% 8 Missing ⚠️
stream.go 86.11% 5 Missing ⚠️
response.go 88.23% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #857      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.64%   96.39%   -0.26%     
==========================================
  Files          13       14       +1     
  Lines        2119     2190      +71     
==========================================
+ Hits         2048     2111      +63     
- Misses         48       56       +8     
  Partials       23       23              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jeevatkm jeevatkm merged commit 487877b into main Sep 19, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
@jeevatkm jeevatkm deleted the content-type-encoders branch September 19, 2024 04:12
jeevatkm added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant