Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SMC-1036: Update @gluwa/evm-network-test tool #556

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

atodorov
Copy link
Contributor

should be more table and not time out when the network is slow, see SMC-1036

Description of proposed changes


Practical tips for PR review & merge:

  • All GitHub Actions report PASS
  • Newly added code/functions have unit tests
    • Coverage tools report all newly added lines as covered
    • The positive scenario is exercised
    • Negative scenarios are exercised, e.g. assert on all possible errors
    • Assert on events triggered if applicable
    • Assert on changes made to storage if applicable
  • Modified behavior/functions - try to make sure above test items are covered
  • Integration tests are added if applicable/needed

Copy link

For full LLVM coverage report click here!

@atodorov atodorov force-pushed the testing/SMC-1036-bump-gluwa-evm-network-test branch 3 times, most recently from 1a6615e to 2cc07dd Compare January 28, 2025 09:50
@atodorov atodorov force-pushed the testing/SMC-1036-bump-gluwa-evm-network-test branch 4 times, most recently from 6ca6f23 to fc8329a Compare March 4, 2025 08:41
atodorov added 2 commits March 4, 2025 13:37
From its changelog:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#1280---2025-03-04

> rustup will no longer automatically install the active toolchain if it is not installed. pr#3985
> To ensure its installation, run rustup toolchain install with no arguments.
should be more stable and not time out when the network is slow,
see SMC-1036
@atodorov atodorov force-pushed the testing/SMC-1036-bump-gluwa-evm-network-test branch from fc8329a to 4258ca9 Compare March 4, 2025 12:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant