-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
release-git: add missing aarch64 input to github-release action #100
Open
dennisameling
wants to merge
1
commit into
main
Choose a base branch
from
arm64-missing-pieces
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+1
−0
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dscho I was just going through the entire chain again, and noticed that I missed this part to pass
git_artifacts_aarch64_workflow_run_id
to the workflow.While adding this input, I got
Invalid action input 'git_artifacts_aarch64_workflow_run_id'
in VS Code. I'm pretty sure that's because line 114 usesgit-for-windows/git-for-windows-automation/.github/actions/github-release@release
(therelease
branch), which isn't up-to-date with the latest changes from themain
branch yet. Is that intentional?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this is intentional, and the
release-git
workflow tries to always ensure thatmain
andrelease
start out identically.0f5ecb3 explains the rationale a bit, and 060621a paints a fuller picture.
The tl;dr is: release automation is hard, and the idea is delusional that one could get it all right in a single YAML file that won't need to adapt to external changes, ever, or at least can be adapted correctly before deploying it. Instead, the need to adapt to external changes are typically detected in the middle of a release, with half the things deployed, and the rest still needing to be deployed. Using the composite Actions from a different branch allows that branch to be updated and the workflow job can then be restarted after editing just that job.
Release automation is a lot easier in Azure DevOps' original design, without YAML. You can edit failed tasks in the web browser and then re-run from there. Highly convenient. But then there was this huge push for YAML a couple of years ago, and GitHub Actions was designed with that in mind and therefore only offers YAML that must be part of the commit history, that's why we're stuck with this ugly, ugly, uggallee work-around. GitHub Actions simply lacks the support we need for complex deployments in the real world.