Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change package name to reflect column and row level policies #6

Open
sckott opened this issue Oct 24, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

Change package name to reflect column and row level policies #6

sckott opened this issue Oct 24, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@sckott
Copy link
Member

sckott commented Oct 24, 2024

rls ->

  • dbpol
  • dbpolicies
  • polidb
  • policiesdb
@codebeaker
Copy link

A couple suggestions:

  • bhaRmanasana (table top pose in yoga)
  • RoCoPo (row and column policies) (or similar, like PoCoRo)
  • CRAP (colum and row access policies) - not sure you want to go there but it is an option

And I can almost get us to 'popcorn' but I need help with the 'n':
-PoPCoRN (Policies for Provision of Column or Row ....???? Popcorrn for 'column or row retrieval of nodes'? I feel like we could make this one work but I haven't got it yet)

@sckott
Copy link
Member Author

sckott commented Nov 12, 2024

Thanks Sonu!

  • crap is fun for sure, but should probably avoid that
  • popcorn is pretty great, but I can't think of anything for "N"

maybe peeseer? for pee (policies), see (C), r (rows)

Claude had some ideas

  • databoss
  • rowbot
  • tablemanners
  • tablestakes
  • tableable
  • rowdeo
  • rowcall

@codebeaker
Copy link

lol at peeseer. you could also call it PCR just to confuse a bunch of biologists
I like some of those. tablemanners, rowbot, and tableable are fun. rowcall is nice too. sounds like row-col.

there's also DARC: database access: rows and columns

@seankross
Copy link

Ooo I really like either popcorn or tablemanners.

@sckott
Copy link
Member Author

sckott commented Dec 11, 2024

@codebeaker @seankross so for popcorn we could use "norms" for the "n". Does that work? If not, let's just do tablemanners. I'm eager to get this pkg name change done as I want to change some function name prefixes to use rls

@seankross
Copy link

I am making the executive decision we do tablemanners, I think it's more memorable since it's more conceptually tied to what the package actually does. Thanks all!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants