Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sync upstream v1.31.1 #339

Open
wants to merge 1,808 commits into
base: machine-controller-manager-provider
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

aaronfern
Copy link

What this PR does / why we need it:
Sync with upstream autoscaler v1.31.1

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #320

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

Synced changes till v1.31.1 of upstream autoscaler

k8s-ci-robot and others added 30 commits June 27, 2024 04:57
…troller-logging

vpa-admission-controller: Log object's namespace
Use autoscaling.x-k8s.io rather than cluster-autoscaler.kubernetes.io
Update Azure cluster-autoscaler e2e cluster template
…ogging

vpa-recommender: Log object's namespace
Remove not yet supported parameter from admission-controller deployment
…bleDiskTypes-parsing

Fix: GCE FetchAvailableDiskTypes zones parsing
Add Azure cluster-autoscaler e2e test
Update Azure cluster-autoscaler e2e test
Change GCE AnnotationNodeInfoProvider nested provider to interface instead of concrete type
This reverts commit 7a1aea1.

As per
kubernetes#6788 (comment)
and discussion in DM. The preference is to split the string inside the
main.go file.
@aaronfern aaronfern requested review from unmarshall, rishabh-11 and a team as code owners December 3, 2024 06:34
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Dec 3, 2024

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
1 out of 15 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ aaronfern
❌ aleksandra-malinowska
❌ charliedmcb
❌ asobti
❌ abdelrahman882
❌ MaciekPytel
❌ nojnhuh
❌ k8s-ci-robot
❌ rakechill
❌ kamalkraj
❌ k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot
❌ Shubham82
❌ gjtempleton
❌ apricote
❌ ceuity
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Dec 3, 2024
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added needs/review Needs review size/xl Size of pull request is huge (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) needs/second-opinion Needs second review by someone else labels Dec 3, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Dec 3, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Dec 3, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Dec 3, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Dec 3, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Dec 3, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Dec 3, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Dec 3, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Dec 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) needs/review Needs review needs/second-opinion Needs second review by someone else size/xl Size of pull request is huge (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Issue for - Sync with Upstream v1.31