Update contribution guidelines and add development section #81
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
I'll use these instructions to see if I can fix that orb to use latest docker images and latest way to activate unity. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
61-68: Consider adding security notes about private orbsThe workflow update instructions are clear, but it might be helpful to add a note about security considerations when using development/private orbs in production environments.
Add a note like:
```yaml orbs: unity: <your-namespace>/<your-orb-name>@dev:first
+> Note: Development and private orbs should only be used for testing purposes.
+> Always review and validate changes thoroughly before promoting to production.</blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: CHILL** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a1ddf0924ba51fb2a6ddff27c891df0b09ce7f37 and e6245652e20ed88a70e92fd79a2cb440b1f42af9. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (1)</summary> * `README.md` (2 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (2)</summary> <details> <summary>README.md (2)</summary> `48-60`: **LGTM! Clear and practical development instructions** The step-by-step guide with practical commands makes it easy for contributors to test their changes. --- `17-17`: **Verify the existence of CONTRIBUTING.md file** The link to CONTRIBUTING.md is a good addition for detailed guidelines. Let's verify that this file exists in the repository. <details> <summary>✅ Verification successful</summary> **Link to CONTRIBUTING.md is valid and correctly referenced** The CONTRIBUTING.md file exists in the repository root, confirming that the relative path `./CONTRIBUTING.md` in the README.md is correct and functional. </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check if CONTRIBUTING.md exists in the repository # Expected: File should exist since it's referenced if [ -f "CONTRIBUTING.md" ]; then echo "✓ CONTRIBUTING.md exists" else echo "✗ CONTRIBUTING.md is missing" fiLength of output: 87
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
44-48: Consider adding more context to the environment variables.While the commands are clear, it would be helpful to add:
- An explanation of what constitutes a valid namespace
- A note about semantic versioning for the VERSION variable
- Example values for better clarity
```bash +# Your CircleCI organization/account name export NAMESPACE="<your-namespace>" +# Name for your development version of the orb export ORB_NAME="<your-orb-name>" +# Development version tag (follows semantic versioning) export VERSION="dev:first"</blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: CHILL** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e6245652e20ed88a70e92fd79a2cb440b1f42af9 and 161895683c4fb670339ae2565632293616e3631a. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (1)</summary> * `README.md` (2 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>🧰 Additional context used</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 LanguageTool</summary> <details> <summary>README.md</summary> [style] ~37-~37: Consider replacing ‘only’ with a different word to let your writing stand out. Context: ...:** Development and private orbs should only be used for testing purposes. Always re... (ONLY_EXCLUSIVELY_STYLE) </details> </details> </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (2)</summary> <details> <summary>README.md (2)</summary> `17-17`: **LGTM! Clear contribution guidelines reference added.** The addition of the CONTRIBUTING.md link successfully addresses the first PR objective and provides clear guidance for contributors. --- `35-71`: **LGTM! Comprehensive development guide added.** The new development section successfully fulfills the second PR objective by providing clear, step-by-step instructions for testing orb changes. <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 LanguageTool</summary> [style] ~37-~37: Consider replacing ‘only’ with a different word to let your writing stand out. Context: ...:** Development and private orbs should only be used for testing purposes. Always re... (ONLY_EXCLUSIVELY_STYLE) </details> </details> </details> </details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
|
I still haven't tested these instructions, but they seem correct. I'll give this a try later this week and merge asap. |
Closes #80
Summary by CodeRabbit
README.mdfor enhanced clarity and guidance for contributors.CONTRIBUTING.mddocument for better accessibility.