Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add an option to skip the mate cigar in EstimateRnaSeqInsertSize #871

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

nh13
Copy link
Member

@nh13 nh13 commented Aug 16, 2022

No description provided.

@nh13 nh13 requested review from tfenne and NatPRoach August 16, 2022 23:16
(includeDuplicates || !rec.duplicate) && // no duplicates, unless specified
rec.mapped && rec.mateMapped && // both ends of a pair are mapped
rec.refIndex == rec.mateRefIndex && // both ends of a pair map to the same contig
(!skipMissingMateCigar || rec.mateCigar.isDefined) // skip records with missing mate cigars if specified
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

moved filters out of the old "htsjdk" filter style, so this could use a double-check

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #871 (3caccf0) into main (da9ecbc) will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #871      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.66%   95.68%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         125      125              
  Lines        7239     7229      -10     
  Branches      507      481      -26     
==========================================
- Hits         6925     6917       -8     
+ Misses        314      312       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 95.68% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...crumgenomics/rnaseq/EstimateRnaSeqInsertSize.scala 100.00% <100.00%> (+1.70%) ⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@NatPRoach NatPRoach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks @nh13

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants