Replace poetry by hatch #3
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@fschuch has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 42 minutes and 50 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe project introduces comprehensive updates, primarily focusing on enhancing the GitHub Actions workflows, transitioning from Poetry to Hatch for package management, and refining the documentation setup. Key changes include new workflows for dependency updates, release preparation, CI/CD processes, and documentation deployment. Additionally, pre-commit hooks were updated, and significant modifications were made to the project configuration files, enhancing development workflows and quality assurance. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
poetry.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (28)
- .github/dependabot.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/1-prepare-release.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/2-tag-release.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/check-links.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ci.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/docs.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/update-pre-commits.yaml (1 hunks)
- .gitignore (3 hunks)
- .pre-commit-config.yaml (1 hunks)
- .vscode/extensions.json (1 hunks)
- .vscode/settings.json (1 hunks)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- changelog.d/+26504d7b.added.md (1 hunks)
- changelog.d/+372e2893.changed.md (1 hunks)
- changelog.d/+437da835.added.md (1 hunks)
- changelog.d/+801234df.changed.md (1 hunks)
- changelog.d/+b04ee6f1.added.md (1 hunks)
- changelog.d/+ff95a66f.removed.md (1 hunks)
- docs/_toc.yml (1 hunks)
- docs/markdown-notebooks.md (1 hunks)
- hatch.toml (1 hunks)
- pyproject.toml (2 hunks)
- scripts/rename_project_content.py (4 hunks)
- tests/test_core.py (1 hunks)
- towncrier.toml (1 hunks)
- wizard_template/init.py (1 hunks)
- wizard_template/core.py (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (17)
- .github/dependabot.yml
- .github/workflows/1-prepare-release.yaml
- .github/workflows/2-tag-release.yaml
- .github/workflows/check-links.yaml
- .github/workflows/update-pre-commits.yaml
- .gitignore
- .vscode/extensions.json
- .vscode/settings.json
- CHANGELOG.md
- changelog.d/+26504d7b.added.md
- changelog.d/+437da835.added.md
- changelog.d/+b04ee6f1.added.md
- changelog.d/+ff95a66f.removed.md
- docs/_toc.yml
- docs/markdown-notebooks.md
- tests/test_core.py
- towncrier.toml
Additional comments not posted (25)
changelog.d/+801234df.changed.md (1)
1-1: Change accurately reflects the PR's main objective of replacing Poetry with Hatch.changelog.d/+372e2893.changed.md (1)
1-1: Enhancement to the release workflow is clearly described and relevant to the PR's objectives.wizard_template/__init__.py (1)
3-3: Updated import statement reflects the new module structure accurately.wizard_template/core.py (2)
4-10: Introduction of the custom exceptionNotAnIntegerErroris well-documented and implemented correctly.
36-36: Update indemo_functionto use the new custom exception is correctly implemented..pre-commit-config.yaml (1)
5-5: Updates to pre-commit hooks and their configurations are consistent with the PR's objectives to enhance automation and dependency management.Also applies to: 9-18, 20-25, 30-30, 35-35, 41-45
.github/workflows/docs.yaml (1)
1-60: New workflow for documentation deployment is well-structured and includes detailed steps, aligning with the PR's objectives.hatch.toml (1)
38-38: Dependencies for the documentation environment are well-defined.pyproject.toml (4)
1-1: Project metadata is correctly updated to reflect the new tooling and project structure.
41-41: Coverage configuration is appropriately set to include all relevant source files.
72-72: Build system dependencies are correctly specified to ensure a smooth build process.
33-33: Ensure the pytest minimum version is compatible with other testing tools used in the project..github/workflows/ci.yaml (5)
1-1: The CI workflow is correctly named and triggers are appropriately set for push, pull_request, and schedule events.
36-36: Matrix strategy for testing across different operating systems and Python versions is well-implemented.
66-66: Build job is well-configured to handle package building and artifact uploading.
87-87: Release job conditions are correctly set to trigger only on valid tags, ensuring secure and intended deployments.
26-26: Ensure the QA job uses a secure setup for checking out code and setting up Python.Verification successful
The QA job in the CI workflow uses
actions/checkout@v4andactions/setup-python@v5, which are the latest versions and include security updates and best practices.
.github/workflows/ci.yaml:
actions/checkout@v4actions/setup-python@v5Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify security settings for the QA job in the CI workflow. # Test: Check for secure practices in checkout and setup-python actions. Expect: Secure practices are used. grep -A 10 "qa:" .github/workflows/ci.yaml | grep -E "actions/checkout|actions/setup-python"Length of output: 164
scripts/rename_project_content.py (4)
23-23: TheGitInfoclass is well-documented and provides a clear structure for storing git information.
48-48: Error handling infrom_repo_info_with_fallbackprovides a good user experience by allowing manual input on failure.
59-59: The main function effectively orchestrates the renaming process, ensuring a smooth user experience.
29-29: Ensure thefrom_repo_infomethod robustly handles different git URL formats.README.md (4)
21-21: Overview section clearly explains the purpose and features of the template.
83-83: Quick Start guide provides a comprehensive step-by-step setup process.
160-160: Dependencies section accurately lists and explains how dependencies are managed.
177-177: Code quality enforcement strategies are well-documented and provide clear instructions for usage.
The project will use Automatically generated release notes from now on
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- .github/release.yml (1 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- hatch.toml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- hatch.toml
Additional context used
LanguageTool
README.md
[uncategorized] ~37-~37: In this context, “any time” needs to be split into two words. (AT_ANYTIME)
Context: ...nteractive tutorials. You can check at anytime the environments and scripts that are p...
[uncategorized] ~78-~78: “you” seems less likely than “your” (belonging to you). (AI_HYDRA_LEO_CP_YOU_YOUR)
Context: ...# Use the template as a start point for you own project 1. Click on [Use this temp...
[style] ~84-~84: This phrase is often redundant. Consider writing “I” unless you want to emphasize that you and not someone else will do something. Then, commas might be missing. (I_MYSELF)
Context: ...ing the instructions for your OS. - I personally like to keep the Python environments wi...
[style] ~176-~176: Consider using an alternative to avoid wordiness and strengthen your wording. (FROM_TIME_TO_TIME)
Context: ...to run the checks on the whole codebase from time to time (when a new hook is added or on Pull ...
[typographical] ~207-~207: A comma between “please” and the verb is normally not needed. If you want to signal a pause, consider using an em dash instead. (PLEASE_UNNECESSARY_COMMA)
Context: ...bot.yml)). ### Managing the Changelog Please, refer to [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachan...
[uncategorized] ~224-~224: “an” (indefinite article before a vowel sound) seems less likely than “and” (in addition to, following this). (AI_HYDRA_LEO_CP_AN_AND)
Context: ...covered from the version control system an exported to the file `wizard_template/_...
[style] ~251-~251: In American English, abbreviations like “etc.” require a period. (ETC_PERIOD)
Context: ...e.g.,1.2.3,0.0.1.rc2,2023.2.0, etc). The action then: - Process the pe...
[grammar] ~288-~288: Possible agreement error -- use the past participle here. (HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT)
Context: ...hon package can show that it has inline type annotations. These annotations are usef...
Additional comments not posted (10)
.github/release.yml (7)
3-5: LGTM! The "Security" category is well-defined.
6-8: LGTM! The "Removed" category is well-defined.
9-11: LGTM! The "Deprecated" category is well-defined.
12-14: LGTM! The "Added" category is well-defined.
15-17: LGTM! The "Changed" category is well-defined.
18-20: LGTM! The "Fixed" category is well-defined.
21-28: LGTM! The "Internals" category is well-defined, including the addition of "dependencies".README.md (3)
202-204: LGTM! The continuous integration section is comprehensive and informative.
242-278: LGTM! The publishing section is comprehensive and informative.Tools
LanguageTool
[style] ~251-~251: In American English, abbreviations like “etc.” require a period. (ETC_PERIOD)
Context: ...e.g.,1.2.3,0.0.1.rc2,2023.2.0, etc). The action then: - Process the pe...
282-302: LGTM! The miscellaneous section is comprehensive and informative.Tools
LanguageTool
[grammar] ~288-~288: Possible agreement error -- use the past participle here. (HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT)
Context: ...hon package can show that it has inline type annotations. These annotations are usef...
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
CHANGELOG.mdfor documenting project changes.towncrierfor managing changelogs.Bug Fixes
.gitignoreto exclude specific files and directories.Documentation
README.mdwith updated instructions and tooling changes.Refactor
pyproject.toml.Chores