[Feat] Tag Type #8692
[Feat] Tag Type #8692
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request implements a comprehensive tag type system in the Gauzy application, introducing new interfaces, entities, services, controllers, and modules to support tag type functionality. Key changes include updates to the tag model, the creation of a new Changes
Possibly Related PRs
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 2883b91.
☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (10)
packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/repository/mikro-orm-tag-type.repository.ts (1)
4-4: Consider adding custom repository methods for TagType-specific queries.
At the moment, the repository class only extends the base repository with no additional functionality. If custom needs arise (e.g., domain-specific queries, aggregations, or validations), consider adding methods here instead of scattering them elsewhere.packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/repository/type-orm-tag-type.repository.ts (1)
6-11: Injecting the repository is correct; consider adding specialized methods.
Currently, this class implements the repository forTagTypewithout additional domain-specific logic. If you need specialized queries or business logic (e.g., retrieving tag types by organizational criteria), consider encapsulating them here.packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/default-tag-types.ts (1)
3-40: Centralized default tag types are beneficial; watch for future duplicates.
Defining default tag types is a neat addition. However, watch for potential future duplication across different modules. If you find that these default types are used in multiple places with slight variations, consider categorizing them or allowing for dynamic extension so that the code doesn’t become overly rigid.packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.seed.ts (2)
1-2: Consider grouping imports.
The imports look fine, but grouping them by domain (e.g., TypeORM vs Gauzy vs local libs) can make them easier to scan.
11-20: Use array methods consistently.
MixingforEachandforin the same loop is slightly inconsistent. You could change the outer iteration to aforloop or map instead offorEachfor clarity.- DEFAULT_TAG_TYPES.forEach(({ type }) => { - for (const organization of organizations) { - // ... - } - }); + for (const { type } of DEFAULT_TAG_TYPES) { + for (const organization of organizations) { + // ... + } + }packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.module.ts (1)
21-23: Ensure consistent module exports.
It’s good practice to export only what other modules need. Check if external modules truly need direct access to bothTypeOrmModuleandMikroOrmModule.packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.entity.ts (1)
1-7: Naming of entity can be more descriptive.
TagTypeis straightforward, but consider if a more specific name (e.g.,TagCategoryorTagClassification) might better reflect the domain.packages/contracts/src/lib/tag.model.ts (1)
25-25: Extend filter capabilities.
IncludingtagTypeIdinITagFindInputis helpful. Consider also adding more advanced filtering (e.g., partial name search) if the product road map calls for it.packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.controller.ts (2)
35-37: Handle large datasets carefully.
While counting records is straightforward, be mindful of potential performance implications ifFindOptionsWheregrows complex. Consider indexing or caching strategies to handle large data sets efficiently.
58-60: Possibility to add advanced filtering or searching.
Returning allTagTyperecords is acceptable, but you might want to accept more refined query parameters (beyond pagination) for advanced filtering or search. This can help limit payload size and improve user experience.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
packages/contracts/src/lib/tag.model.ts(2 hunks)packages/core/src/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/lib/core/entities/index.ts(2 hunks)packages/core/src/lib/core/entities/internal.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/default-tag-types.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/repository/mikro-orm-tag-type.repository.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/repository/type-orm-tag-type.repository.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.controller.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.entity.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.module.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.seed.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.service.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/lib/tags/tag.entity.ts(3 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/index.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (19)
packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/repository/mikro-orm-tag-type.repository.ts (1)
1-2: Existing base repository usage looks good.
The import statements for both the base repository and theTagTypeentity are appropriate and consistent with the intended usage.packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/repository/type-orm-tag-type.repository.ts (1)
1-3: Imports are clearly separated and consistent.
The use of@InjectRepositorywith theTagTypeentity is logically correct and follows the NestJS typing guidelines.packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.seed.ts (2)
6-10: Validate potential repeated creation of tag type entries.
IfcreateTagTypesis called multiple times with overlapping organizations, there’s a possibility of duplicates. Consider adding checks or unique constraints ontype,organization, andtenantto avoid duplicate records.
21-24: Check error handling on insert.
SinceinsertLevelsreturns a promise, consider wrapping it in proper try/catch blocks or letting errors propagate to a higher layer to ensure that failures are handled gracefully.packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.module.ts (2)
1-10: Module dependencies look good.
All required modules and imports appear appropriate forTagTypeModule. Good job organizing them.
11-20: Verify route path correctness.
The router path is set to/tag-types. Double-check that your frontend is expecting this endpoint and that no further path segments are needed.packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.entity.ts (2)
9-11: Consider markingtypeas unique.
If each organization’s tag types need to be uniquely named, adding a uniqueness constraint can prevent duplicates. If not, ignore.
19-24: Ensure relationships are flushed in correct order.
If you plan on creatingTagentries that reference this entity, confirm the seeding or creation order so thatTagTypeis always persisted before referencing it.packages/contracts/src/lib/tag.model.ts (2)
15-16: Optional chaining for tag types.
MarkingtagTypeIdandtagTypeas optional is sensible, ensuring that existing tags are not forced to adopt a tag type.
30-33: ITagType interface is well-defined.
TheITagTypeinterface covers the essential fields. If future extension is expected, ensure compatibility with your service logic and the entity.packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.controller.ts (3)
1-2: Imports look good.
Your import statements cover all the necessary NestJS, Swagger, TypeORM, and contracts modules. Everything seems in order for this controller.
7-11: Confirm permission scopes.
The combination ofTenantPermissionGuardandPermissionGuardlooks correct for a multi-tenant setup, but please verify that you have the appropriate roles and permissions in place to ensure only authorized users can manageTagType.
14-16: Constructor correctly extends the CrudController.
By invoking the superclass withtagTypesService, you inherit standard CRUD methods without duplicating code. This is a solid approach.packages/core/src/index.ts (1)
103-103: Exporting TagTypeModule & TagTypeService is consistent with the pattern.
This ensures the new module and service are publicly available. Good move for modular design.packages/core/src/lib/tags/tag.entity.ts (3)
2-2: Check for any unused imports.
JoinColumnis used, but confirm that other imported decorators likeRelationIdare still needed throughout. Housekeeping can help maintain clarity.
77-77: Import of TagType is appropriate.
The reference toTagTypematches the new relationship property. This lines up well with the newly introduced entity.
119-135: Ensure orphaned tags are properly handled.
UsingonDelete: 'SET NULL'is fine if you want to preserve tags after aTagTyperemoval. Confirm that your business logic is OK with tags not having a type if the parentTagTypeis deleted.packages/core/src/lib/core/entities/internal.ts (1)
134-134: Exporting TagType as part of core entities is consistent.
This aligns with the standard practice of centralizing entity exports ininternal.ts. Your approach is clear and maintainable.packages/core/src/lib/core/entities/index.ts (1)
133-133: LGTM! Clean integration of the TagType entity.The
TagTypeentity has been properly integrated into both the imports and exports sections, maintaining alphabetical order and following the established patterns in the file.Also applies to: 290-290
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.service.ts (1)
11-15: Fix inconsistent spacing in constructor parameters.There's an extra blank line between the constructor parameters. Maintain consistent spacing for better readability.
constructor( @InjectRepository(TagType) typeOrmTagTypeRepository: TypeOrmTagTypeRepository, - mikroOrmTagTypeRepository: MikroOrmTagTypeRepository ) {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.service.ts(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.service.ts (2)
11-12: Consider renaming the repository parameter for clarity.The parameter name
typeOrmTagTypeRepositorywould better reflect its purpose, maintaining consistency with the entity it manages.
1-18: LGTM! The service implementation follows best practices.The service is well-structured with proper dependency injection, extends the appropriate base class, and correctly implements the repository pattern with support for both TypeORM and MikroORM.
rahul-rocket
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/default-tag-types.ts (2)
22-35: Consider sorting tag types and improving naming consistency.The tag types array would benefit from:
- Alphabetical sorting for easier maintenance
- Consistent naming (e.g., "Organization Contact" vs "Employee" - consider using consistent prefixes)
17-19: Enhance documentation example.The current example (
console.log) doesn't demonstrate practical usage. Consider showing how to use these tag types in a real scenario.Replace with a more meaningful example:
// Example of using default tag types to initialize database async function seedDefaultTagTypes(tagTypeService: TagTypeService) { await Promise.all( DEFAULT_TAG_TYPES.map(tagType => tagTypeService.create(tagType)) ); }packages/contracts/src/lib/tag.model.ts (2)
2-2: Consider making tagType required if tagTypeId is presentThe relationship between
tagTypeIdandtagTypeproperties in theITaginterface could be more strictly typed to ensure data consistency.Consider using a union type to enforce this relationship:
export interface ITag extends IBasePerTenantAndOrganizationEntityModel, IRelationalOrganizationTeam { // ... other properties tagTypeId?: ID; tagType?: tagTypeId extends undefined ? undefined : ITagType; }Also applies to: 15-16
30-33: Add validation constraints to ITagTypeThe
ITagTypeinterface could benefit from additional constraints to ensure data integrity.Consider adding these constraints:
export interface ITagType { type: string & { minLength: 1; maxLength: 255 }; // Ensure non-empty and reasonable length tags?: ITag[] & { unique: true }; // Ensure no duplicate tags }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
packages/contracts/src/lib/tag.model.ts(3 hunks)packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/default-tag-types.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.controller.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.entity.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.module.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.seed.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.service.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/lib/tags/tag.entity.ts(5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- packages/core/src/lib/tags/tag.entity.ts
- packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.entity.ts
- packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.controller.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.service.ts
[error] 9-14: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.service.ts (2)
9-14: Constructor is necessary for dependency injection.While the static analysis tool flags this as an unnecessary constructor, it's actually required for NestJS dependency injection to work properly. The constructor properly initializes the parent class with both ORM repositories.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 9-14: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
10-10: Naming alignment and injection consistency could be improved.The injected repository parameter name
typeOrmTagTypeRepositoryshould align with the class's purpose.packages/contracts/src/lib/tag.model.ts (1)
25-25: LGTM! Type changes look goodThe changes to use
IDtype instead ofstringin bothITagFindInputandITagUpdateInputare consistent with the base entity model.Also applies to: 36-36
packages/core/src/lib/tag-type/tag-type.seed.ts (1)
6-33: Great documentation!The JSDoc comments are comprehensive and include excellent examples. This helps maintain code quality and improves developer experience.
PR
Please note: we will close your PR without comment if you do not check the boxes above and provide ALL requested information.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Technical Updates
tag_typetable in the database.