Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update ERC-7627: Move to Review #537

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Sep 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

chenly
Copy link
Contributor

@chenly chenly commented Jul 13, 2024

When opening a pull request to submit a new EIP, please use the suggested template: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/eip-template.md

We have a GitHub bot that automatically merges some PRs. It will merge yours immediately if certain criteria are met:

  • The PR edits only existing draft PRs.
  • The build passes.
  • Your GitHub username or email address is listed in the 'author' header of all affected PRs, inside .
  • If matching on email address, the email address is the one publicly listed on your GitHub profile.

@eip-review-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eip-review-bot commented Jul 13, 2024

✅ All reviewers have approved.

Copy link
Collaborator

@SamWilsn SamWilsn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your Rationale section is answering the question "why do we need this standard?". That kind of content belongs in the Motivation section, while the Rationale section should explain choices made within the proposal. My favourite analogy is:

Motivation: We need to build a shed because...
Rationale: We chose to paint the shed red because...


Everything else looks decent though!

The mapping is by user address and a unique key index.
@chenly
Copy link
Contributor Author

chenly commented Aug 29, 2024

As you mentioned, having a wallet store only one public key is not a good design. I modified the implementation to allow users to set multiple public keys and specify expiration times.

@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot enabled auto-merge (squash) September 3, 2024 14:36
Copy link
Collaborator

@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...

@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot merged commit ab5518b into ethereum:master Sep 3, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants