Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add EIP: Backward-Compatible Post-Quantum Migration #8454

Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

nixxypQCee
Copy link

Proposal to enhance the digital signing system for Ethereum to include a quantum-safe proof-of-knowledge (QSPoK) to ensure that the security of the transactions cannot be compromised by a quantum computer. Backward-compatibility is achieved by only introducing minimal changes to the existing implementations of Ethereum validators and clients.

QSPoK implementations include Zero-Knowledge Scalable Transparent Argument of Knowledge (zkSTARK) or MPC-in-the-Head (MPCitH).

@github-actions github-actions bot added c-new Creates a brand new proposal s-draft This EIP is a Draft t-core labels Apr 18, 2024
@eth-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eth-bot commented Apr 18, 2024

File EIPS/eip-7693.md

Requires 1 more reviewers from @axic, @g11tech, @gcolvin, @lightclient, @SamWilsn

@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci Waiting on CI to pass label Apr 18, 2024
@eth-bot eth-bot added e-consensus Waiting on editor consensus e-review Waiting on editor to review labels Apr 18, 2024
Copy link

The commit 6262259 (as a parent of 59296a5) contains errors.
Please inspect the Run Summary for details.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the w-ci Waiting on CI to pass label Apr 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c-new Creates a brand new proposal e-consensus Waiting on editor consensus e-review Waiting on editor to review s-draft This EIP is a Draft t-core
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants