ssl: Document TLS alerts in ssl_error messages #9067
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
CT Test Results 2 files 66 suites 47m 30s ⏱️ Results for commit 253a7e6. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. To speed up review, make sure that you have read Contributing to Erlang/OTP and that all checks pass. See the TESTING and DEVELOPMENT HowTo guides for details about how to run test locally. Artifacts// Erlang/OTP Github Action Bot |
IngelaAndin
previously approved these changes
Nov 18, 2024
IngelaAndin
added
the
testing
|
@essen It is ready for merge, I think it could be target for maint to improve the docs earlier that OTP-28. |
|
OK I will rebase. |
essen
force-pushed
the
ssl-document-tls-alerts-in-messages
branch
from
932d571 to
253a7e6
Compare
|
Done. |
IngelaAndin
approved these changes
Nov 20, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Small improvement discussed in #9051