Skip to content

Consistent chemical_formula and alt_names in api? #229

Description

@soofstad

As of now, the chemical_formula part of the components are just taken from the fortran code. These are, however, not all valid chemical formulas (e.g. mercury has "Hg" (valid), but neohexane has "22-dm-C4" (invalid)). Furthermore, some of the components have three names (e.g. neohexane which has "22-dm-C4" as (invalid!) chemical_formula and the alt_name "2-2-dimethyl-butane(neohexane)"). In the case of neohexane we also see that the chemical_formula and the alt_name are essentially the same, except that the latter is more written out. We should ask PO how they want to have these properties.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    questionFurther information is requested

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions