25 ibg

[FredericSabot]

closes #3011

Checklist before requesting a review

use '[x]' to check the checkboxes, or submit the PR and then click the checkboxes

• unit tests and non-regression tests were added (new model, new feature and bug fix)
• main documentation was updated (update of input/output file, 3rd party, model, repository organization, solver)
• example documentations were updated (new example in examples folder)
• the corresponding milestone was added in the ticket and in this PR
• if this PR modifies the parameters or inputs/outputs of a model/solver: the corresponding xsl was added in util/xsl and platform DB were updated
• if this PR modifies a dictionary: the corresponding french dictionary was updated

[FredericSabot]

Hello, I am currently implementing the WECC der_a model and I plan to add it to this PR since it has a few common building blocks. I am quite busy at the moment but should normally be able to update the PR and account for the comments early February.

[FredericSabot]

Added the der_a model and updated PR following comments

[FredericSabot]

In the current implementation, the solver (either IDA or SIM) will sometimes fail with

The following assertion has been violated %sat time %f
ibg.currentLimitsCalculation1.iqMaxPu >= ibg.currentLimitsCalculation1.iqMinPu 1.284

This is strange because the current limitation model is the same as in for WECC PV plants (WECC.BaseControls.CurrentLimitsCalculationPV). This occurs when iP increases leading to iQmax and iQmin=-iQmax "cross" at 0 due to extrapolation.

@rosiereflo : I haven't tested this extensively, but in the attached test case, removing the noEvent in the equation below solves the issue.

iqMaxPu = noEvent(if (abs(IMaxPu) > abs(ipLimPu)) then sqrt(IMaxPu ^ 2 - ipLimPu ^ 2) else 0);
iqMinPu = - iqMaxPu;

TestCase.zip