feat: use pointer for optional structures #139
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Following the revert #102 and your comment on #101, I applied it and it seems to work well. I found the original xsd that was causing issue in #101 (https://www.fpml.org/spec/fpml-5-9-3-wd-3/html/recordkeeping/schemaDocumentation/schemas/xmldsig-core-schema_xsd/schema-overview.html#a76), but there was still issues with ArrayType nodes. Not using pointers for ArrayType fixed these.
Not sure if using pointers for optional fields is still of interest though.
Thanks for your work !