Skip to content

Add support for building with buildkit #3344

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

felipecrs
Copy link

@felipecrs felipecrs commented Jun 27, 2025

Requires passing version='2' like:

stream = self.client.build(
    fileobj=dockerfile, tag='myimage', version='2'
)

Refs https://github.com/moby/moby/blob/3ff85c73436f1c4f8d9764a0d72e41a03b4116f5/api/swagger.yaml#L9343-L9352.

Closes #2230

@felipecrs
Copy link
Author

felipecrs commented Jun 29, 2025

@thaJeztah do you think you can take a look at this one?

I know the PR backlog is full, but in my opinion this PR is a no-brainer and is of huge help (#2230 has 200+ upvotes).

raise errors.InvalidVersion(
'version was only introduced in API version 1.38'
)
params['version'] = version

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bumping up the version number doesn't magically implement the BuildKit API.
You have to dial /grpc to call the BuildKit gRPC API.
https://github.com/docker/buildx/blob/v0.25.0/driver/docker/driver.go
https://github.com/moby/buildkit/blob/v0.23.1/api/services/control/control.proto

In addition to implementing the gRPC client, you also have to implement several "attachable" servers (auth, secret, ssh) via the reverse-gRPC connection.
https://github.com/moby/buildkit/blob/v0.23.1/cmd/buildctl/build.go#L191-L214

This is quite complicated than you might imagine; I suggest just shelling out docker buildx and call it a day.

Copy link
Author

@felipecrs felipecrs Jun 30, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot for reviewing it.

Bumping up the version number doesn't magically implement the BuildKit API.

Tests prove you are wrong. No?

In addition to implementing the gRPC client, you also have to implement several "attachable" servers (auth, secret, ssh) via the reverse-gRPC connection.

Exposing additional options can be done in follow-up PRs. This PR is sufficient for my use case which is building Dockerfiles that depend on BuilKit-features that are not auth, secret, or ssh.

I suggest just shelling out docker buildx and call it a day.

That means installing docker buildx, which means installing docker cli. It's a big downside comparing to just calling the Rest API.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only basic BuildKit features can be enabled by just bumping up the version:
https://github.com/moby/moby/blob/v28.3.0/api/server/backend/build/backend.go#L55-L73

The scope of the available features should be documented

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you mean I should clarify that squash and forcerm will error when version=2?

Otherwise, I expect all options currently supported by client.build() to be supported.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will test it more, and let you know.

Copy link
Author

@felipecrs felipecrs Jun 30, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, this is worse than I expected.

I got lucky with the tests because I only tried with FROM scratch.

Even a basic Dockerfile like below does not work:

    @requires_api_version('1.38')
    def test_build_buildkit_alpine(self):
        script = io.BytesIO('\n'.join([
            'FROM alpine',
        ]).encode('ascii'))

        self.tmp_imgs.append('buildkitalpine')

        stream = self.client.build(
            fileobj=script, tag='buildkitalpine',
            version='2'
        )

        for _chunk in stream:
            pass

        assert self.client.inspect_image('buildkitalpine')

But it's because of a bug:

Still, it means not even basic use cases like pulling an image that doesn't require auth will not be able to use this feature.

@AkihiroSuda do you have any idea? Otherwise, I think it may be the end of this PR (and a dream). :(

This comment says creating a basic session is enough for pull to work. Do you think it would be acceptable to build a solution around it?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This moby/moby#48112 (comment) says creating a basic session is enough for pull to work. Do you think it would be acceptable to build a solution around it?

SGTM

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I haven't been able to build anything so far, but I will update when I have any news.

Copy link

@AkihiroSuda AkihiroSuda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@felipecrs felipecrs requested a review from AkihiroSuda June 30, 2025 03:51
felipecrs and others added 2 commits June 30, 2025 01:41
Signed-off-by: Felipe Santos <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Akihiro Suda <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Santos <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support BuildKit
2 participants