Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI bug fix #336

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: phobos-ci-stable
Choose a base branch
from
Open

CI bug fix #336

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

trampler
Copy link

  • The default parameter of include_unstopped_branches is inconsistent and results in a failed assertion with submodels
  • PyBullet availability check was not working
  • The submodel definition is a dictionary (at least for me)

hwiedPro added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
@@ -258,7 +258,8 @@ def export_xml(self, outputdir=None, format="urdf", filename=None, float_fmt_dic

def export_smurf(self, outputdir=None, outputfile=None, robotfile=None,
check_submechs=True, with_submodel_defs=False,
with_meshes=True, mesh_format=None, additional_meshes=None, rel_mesh_pathes=None):
with_meshes=True, mesh_format=None, additional_meshes=None, rel_mesh_pathes=None,
submodels=None):
""" Export self and all annotations inside a given folder with structure
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems to be a new feature, could you please open a separate PR for this?

@hwiedPro
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @trampler ,
The fixes I included in the marked commits on develop.

The selectable submodels for the export_smurf seems a cool new feature, ould you open a separate PR for those?

The issue with the include_unstopped_branches, didn't yet occur for me. Do you have an example where this leads to problems?

Best,
Henning

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants