Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bmc static and dynamic discovery changes #2516

Open
wants to merge 30 commits into
base: pub/new_architecture
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

abhishek-sa1
Copy link
Contributor

@abhishek-sa1 abhishek-sa1 commented Feb 25, 2025

Issues Resolved by this Pull Request

  • bmc static discovery changes for first layer of nodes
  • bmc dynamic discovery changes for default nodes

Suggested Reviewers

@priti-parate @suman-square @nethramg @Aditya-DP @Kratika-P @Milisha-Gupta

{{ python_version }} {{ update_db_static_path }} {{ item.value.bmc_details.static_range }} {{ bmc_nic_subnet }}
{{ static_ip_file }} {{ item.key }} {{ domain_name }} {{ network_data.admin_network.static_range }} {{ pxe_nic_subnet }}
{{ network_data.bmc_network.netmask_bits }} {{ correlation_status }} {{ admin_uncorrelated_node_start_ip }} {{ mtms_db_path }}
{{ item.value.location_id }} {{ item.value.architecture }} {{ item.value.roles[0] }}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why only roles[0] - roles is a list, we will need to store all roles associated right?

@abhishek-sa1 abhishek-sa1 marked this pull request as ready for review March 3, 2025 17:38
@abhishek-sa1 abhishek-sa1 changed the title bmc dynamic discovery changes bmc static and dynamic discovery changes Mar 3, 2025
@abhishek-sa1 abhishek-sa1 force-pushed the pub/new_architecture branch from 5a20672 to 4d6c31a Compare March 3, 2025 17:48
@abhishek-sa1 abhishek-sa1 reopened this Mar 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants