Skip to content

Conversation

@wanghan-iapcm
Copy link
Contributor

@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm commented Jan 13, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Precision Improvements

    • Updated numpy array data types from float32 to float64 for enhanced numerical precision
    • Refined energy and virial value representations in test data files using scientific notation
    • Removed redundant error handling code
  • Test Data Updates

    • Updated energy value formats in multiple test XYZ files for improved accuracy

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 13, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.16%. Comparing base (18ba98d) to head (93f6fc3).
Report is 25 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            devel     #777   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.16%   85.16%           
=======================================
  Files          81       81           
  Lines        7530     7530           
=======================================
  Hits         6413     6413           
  Misses       1117     1117           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jan 13, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #777 will not alter performance

Comparing wanghan-iapcm:break-xyz-prec (93f6fc3) with devel (18ba98d)

Summary

✅ 2 untouched benchmarks

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 13, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces precision-related modifications to the QuipGapxyzSystems class in the quip_gap_xyz.py file. The primary change involves converting numpy array data types from float32 to float64 for various numerical arrays such as virials, cells, coordinates, energies, and forces. This modification aims to enhance numerical precision without altering the underlying functionality. Simultaneously, test files have been updated with more precise scientific notation for energy values, maintaining the dataset's structural integrity.

Changes

File Change Summary
dpdata/xyz/quip_gap_xyz.py - Changed numpy array data types from float32 to float64 for multiple arrays
- Removed redundant RuntimeError line for virials variable
tests/xyz/*.xyz - Updated energy values to scientific notation format
- Maintained dataset structure and content

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Data as Numpy Arrays
    participant Converter as QuipGapxyzSystems
    
    Data->>Converter: Input arrays (float32)
    Converter->>Converter: Convert to float64
    Converter-->>Data: Processed arrays with higher precision
Loading

The sequence diagram illustrates the conversion process from float32 to float64 within the QuipGapxyzSystems class, highlighting the precision enhancement without changing the fundamental data handling logic.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 18ba98d and 93f6fc3.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • dpdata/xyz/quip_gap_xyz.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/xyz/xyz_unittest.field.xyz (2 hunks)
  • tests/xyz/xyz_unittest.sort.xyz (2 hunks)
  • tests/xyz/xyz_unittest.xyz (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
dpdata/xyz/quip_gap_xyz.py (1)

164-164: LGTM! Precision enhancement looks good.

The conversion from float32 to float64 for numerical arrays (virials, cells, coords, energies, forces) aligns well with scientific computing requirements where higher precision is often necessary. However, be aware that this change doubles the memory usage for these arrays.

Let's verify the precision requirements and usage across the codebase:

Also applies to: 178-181

✅ Verification successful

Precision change to float64 is consistent with codebase patterns

The conversion to float64 in quip_gap_xyz.py aligns with the established patterns in the codebase, where production code (e.g., cp2k module) consistently uses float64 precision for scientific computations, while float32 is only used in test data for efficiency.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any float32 specifications that might need updating
# and verify the scientific computing context

# Look for float32/float64 type specifications
rg -i "float(32|64)" --type python

# Look for numpy array creation patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'np.array($x).astype($type)'

Length of output: 117


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for float precision patterns
rg "float(32|64)|np\.(float32|float64)"

# Search for numpy dtype specifications
rg "dtype\s*=\s*(np\.)?(float|f)(32|64)"

# Look for astype conversions
rg "astype\((np\.)?(float|f)(32|64)\)"

# Check for array creation with explicit types
rg "np\.array.*dtype\s*="

Length of output: 10632

tests/xyz/xyz_unittest.xyz (1)

16-16: LGTM! Test data precision update is consistent.

The energy values have been updated to use scientific notation with higher precision, matching the float64 precision enhancement in the implementation.

Also applies to: 28-28

tests/xyz/xyz_unittest.sort.xyz (1)

16-16: LGTM! Test data consistency maintained.

The energy values have been updated consistently with the other test files, maintaining data integrity across the test suite.

Also applies to: 28-28

tests/xyz/xyz_unittest.field.xyz (1)

19-19: LGTM! Field format precision update is consistent.

The energy values have been updated to match the higher precision format while maintaining the specific field structure requirements.

Also applies to: 31-31

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm requested a review from njzjz January 13, 2025 02:30
@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm merged commit 2905792 into deepmodeling:devel Jan 13, 2025
13 checks passed
@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm deleted the break-xyz-prec branch January 13, 2025 10:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants