Skip to content

Feature: Implementations of Range-Separated Hybrid Functionals #6220

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 466 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

1041176461
Copy link
Collaborator

@1041176461 1041176461 commented May 16, 2025

Range-separated hybrid (RSH) functionals are a class of hybrid functionals that partition the Fock exchange into short-range and long-range components:
image
To address the divergence issue of the Coulomb potential at $q\to0$, two distinct RSH frameworks have been implemented:

  1. Conventional Spencer-Alavi truncated Coulomb potential

    • More efficient in initialization,
    • but suffers from divergence when computing long-range corrected hybrid functionals (e.g., LC-PBE).
  2. Massidda’s auxiliary-function-modified Ewald summation scheme

    • Resolves the limitations of the Spencer-Alavi truncation method.

This computational framework serves as the foundation for the upcoming implementation of GW and RT-TDDFT-EXX functionalities.

@dyzheng
Copy link
Collaborator

dyzheng commented May 26, 2025

Congratulations on your outstanding work!
From the perspective of long-term code maintenance, I suggest you add sufficient comments to enable other developers to understand the functionality of this part of the code. Unless you promise to respond and maintain all issues related to the code.

@mohanchen
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi, you may need to resolve the conflicts, thanks for your efforts! @1041176461

@1041176461
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I moved mixing parameters into "conv_coulomb_pot_k.h" and changed short-range hybrid functionals mixing settings to match with range-separated hybrid functionals. @maki49 @AroundPeking @PeizeLin @Flying-dragon-boxing @JGHan7 Please check whether the current modification will affect your code (see commit 9e9c5e8). Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
EXX and lr-TDDFT Related to EXX or lr-TDDFT Features Needed The features are indeed needed, and developers should have sophisticated knowledge Refactor Refactor ABACUS codes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants