Skip to content

fix(tesseract): Filters over proxy time dimensions #9604

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

waralexrom
Copy link
Member

Check List

  • Tests have been run in packages where changes made if available
  • Linter has been run for changed code
  • Tests for the changes have been added if not covered yet
  • Docs have been added / updated if required

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 22, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.10%. Comparing base (7b4e4ad) to head (e4de557).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9604       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage        0   84.10%   +84.10%     
===========================================
  Files           0      230      +230     
  Lines           0    84440    +84440     
===========================================
+ Hits            0    71019    +71019     
- Misses          0    13421    +13421     
Flag Coverage Δ
cubesql 84.10% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Member

@KSDaemon KSDaemon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍🏻 LGTM!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants