Skip to content

Update SDK POJOs to match server POJO implementations #195

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 94 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

shaileshpadave
Copy link
Contributor

@shaileshpadave shaileshpadave commented May 26, 2025

This PR updates multiple SDK POJOs to match the corresponding server implementations.

Automatically generated by Conductor workflow using LLM assistance.

NOTE : Either added new member to model or created new model altogether so backward compatibility is maintained.

@shaileshpadave shaileshpadave force-pushed the auto-sync-pojo branch 2 times, most recently from befb396 to a3dd433 Compare May 29, 2025 18:47
@shaileshpadave shaileshpadave changed the base branch from new-model to main May 30, 2025 07:20
@shaileshpadave shaileshpadave force-pushed the auto-sync-pojo branch 3 times, most recently from ac0f7d8 to c227d93 Compare May 30, 2025 08:04
Shailesh Jagannath Padave and others added 24 commits June 5, 2025 18:31
…gration.chat_completion) to match server implementation
…gration.chat_message) to match server implementation
…gration.embedding_request) to match server implementation
…gration.index_doc_input) to match server implementation
…gration.indexed_doc) to match server implementation
…gration.llm_response) to match server implementation
…gration.llm_worker_input) to match server implementation
…gration.store_embeddings_input) to match server implementation
…gration.text_completion) to match server implementation
…gration.vector_db_input) to match server implementation
…gration.category) to match server implementation
…gration.integration) to match server implementation
…gration.integration_api) to match server implementation
…gration.integration_def) to match server implementation
…gration.prompt_template_test_request) to match server implementation
….access_key_response) to match server implementation
shaileshpadave and others added 22 commits June 5, 2025 18:32
…flow_test_request) to match server implementation
…flow_summary) to match server implementation
…rnal_storage_location) to match server implementation
…gration.config_key) to match server implementation
…rity.resource_type) to match server implementation
…gration.integration_def_form_field) to match server implementation
…rity.subject_type) to match server implementation
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ import "github.com/conductor-sdk/conductor-go/sdk/model"

type IntegrationApi struct {
Api string `json:"api,omitempty"`
Configuration map[string]interface{} `json:"configuration,omitempty"`
Configuration map[ConfigKey]interface{} `json:"configuration,omitempty"`

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

modification - backward compatibility ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good one! we should maintain bc. thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants