Add CurrentStepCompleteModal and CurrentStepCompleteOverlay components. #2332
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces two new components: Changes
Possibly related PRs
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is ✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.
Additional details and impacted files📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
app/components/course-page/current-step-complete-overlay.hbs (2)
1-6: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The
BlurredOverlaycomponent is well-configured with appropriate attributes for visibility control, status update handling, and theming. The use of...attributesallows for flexible customization.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the
did-updatemodifier for better code readability:
7-17: LGTM! Consider adding type checking for @ActiveStep.The component structure using named blocks for content and overlay is well-organized. The
CoursePage::CurrentStepCompleteModalis correctly placed and receives appropriate props.Consider adding type checking for the
@activeStepprop if it's not already done in the component's TypeScript file. This can help catch potential type-related issues early:interface CurrentStepCompleteModalArgs { onClose: () => void; activeStep: YourActiveStepType; // Replace with the actual type }app/components/course-page/current-step-complete-modal.ts (3)
4-11: LGTM: Well-structured Signature interface.The Signature interface provides good type safety for the component. It correctly defines the Element type and the expected props in the Args object.
Consider adding JSDoc comments to describe the purpose of each property in the Args object. This can improve code readability and provide better context for other developers. For example:
Args: { /** Function to be called when the modal is closed */ onClose: () => void; /** The currently active step in the course */ activeStep: Step; };
13-13: LGTM: Component class declaration is correct.The component class correctly extends the Glimmer Component with the defined Signature interface, ensuring type safety.
Consider adding a comment to explain why the class body is empty, or if there are plans to add methods in the future. This can help other developers understand the component's design. For example:
// All component logic is handled in the template export default class CurrentStepCompleteModalComponent extends Component<Signature> {}
1-19: Overall, the CurrentStepCompleteModalComponent is well-implemented.The component is well-structured, type-safe, and follows Ember and TypeScript best practices. It provides a solid foundation for implementing the current step complete modal functionality.
To further improve the component:
- Consider adding unit tests to ensure the component behaves as expected.
- If this modal is likely to be reused in other parts of the application, consider making it more generic by allowing customization of the content and actions through component arguments.
- Ensure that the corresponding template file (
current-step-complete-modal.hbs) is implemented to render the modal content and handle theonCloseaction.app/components/course-page/current-step-complete-modal.hbs (2)
1-1: LGTM! Consider adding an aria-label for accessibility.The ModalBody component is well-structured with appropriate attributes. The use of @allowManualClose={{false}} ensures a guided user experience, and the data-test attribute facilitates testing.
Consider adding an aria-label to improve accessibility:
-<ModalBody @allowManualClose={{false}} @onClose={{@onClose}} class="w-full" data-test-current-step-complete-modal ...attributes> +<ModalBody @allowManualClose={{false}} @onClose={{@onClose}} class="w-full" data-test-current-step-complete-modal aria-label="Step completion modal" ...attributes>
13-23: LGTM! Consider adding an aria-label to the SVG icon.The PrimaryLinkButton component is well-implemented with dynamic routing and clear visual cues. The use of data-test attributes is good for testing.
Consider adding an aria-label to the SVG icon for better accessibility:
- {{svg-jar "arrow-right" class="w-4 ml-1 fill-current flex-shrink-0"}} + {{svg-jar "arrow-right" class="w-4 ml-1 fill-current flex-shrink-0" aria-label="Right arrow"}}app/components/course-page/current-step-complete-overlay.ts (1)
8-18: Consider removing unusedBlocksproperty in theSignatureinterfaceThe
Blocksproperty in theSignatureinterface is defined but not utilized since the component does not yield any block content. You can simplify the interface by removing theBlocksproperty.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- app/components/course-page/current-step-complete-modal.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/course-page/current-step-complete-modal.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/course-page/current-step-complete-overlay.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/course-page/current-step-complete-overlay.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
app/components/course-page/current-step-complete-overlay.hbs (1)
1-17: Great job implementing the CurrentStepCompleteOverlay component!This implementation aligns well with the PR objectives of adding the
CurrentStepCompleteOverlaycomponent. The component effectively manages the display of theCurrentStepCompleteModalbased on the current step's status, as mentioned in the AI summary. The use of a blurred overlay effect enhances the user experience.A few minor suggestions were made to improve code clarity and type safety, but overall, the component is well-structured and follows good practices in Ember.js development.
app/components/course-page/current-step-complete-modal.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are correct and necessary.The imports for the Glimmer Component and the Step type are appropriate for this component.
15-19: LGTM: Glint module augmentation is correct and necessary.The module augmentation for the Ember Glint registry is properly implemented. This ensures type safety when using the component in templates.
The naming convention used for the component in the registry ('CoursePage::CurrentStepCompleteModal') follows a common pattern, which is good for consistency across the project.
app/components/course-page/current-step-complete-modal.hbs (2)
2-10: LGTM! Clear and well-structured content.The modal title and congratulatory message are well-formatted with appropriate styling. The use of semantic HTML and dark mode support is commendable.
1-34: Overall, well-structured component with minor accessibility improvements needed.The CurrentStepCompleteModal component is well-implemented, providing clear user guidance and navigation options. The use of semantic HTML, appropriate styling, and test attributes is commendable. To further enhance the component, consider implementing the suggested accessibility improvements, particularly for the "Stay on this step" option.
app/components/course-page/current-step-complete-overlay.ts (1)
20-48: Well-implemented component logicThe component logic is clear and follows Ember best practices. The use of tracked properties, services, and actions is appropriate, ensuring reactivity and state management are handled correctly.
| <div | ||
| class="text-gray-500 hover:text-gray-800 dark:text-gray-300 text-sm pb-0.25 border-b border-gray-400 dark:border-gray-500 hover:border-gray-600 dark:hover:border-gray-400 flex-shrink-0" | ||
| role="button" | ||
| {{on "click" @onClose}} | ||
| data-test-stay-on-current-step-button | ||
| > | ||
| Stay on this step | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve accessibility by using a button element instead of a div.
While the "Stay on this step" option functions correctly, it can be improved for better accessibility and keyboard navigation.
Consider the following changes:
- Use a
<button>element instead of a<div>for better semantic meaning and built-in keyboard accessibility. - Add
:focusstyles to match the hover styles for keyboard navigation.
Here's a suggested implementation:
This change ensures the element is natively focusable and actionable with the keyboard, improving accessibility.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- app/components/course-page/previous-steps-incomplete-modal.hbs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
app/components/course-page/previous-steps-incomplete-modal.hbs (1)
Line range hint
1-34: Overall, the modal component structure looks good.The
previous-steps-incomplete-modalcomponent appears to be well-structured and functional. It clearly communicates the purpose of the modal and provides appropriate actions for the user.A few observations:
- The modal uses appropriate semantic HTML elements and Ember components.
- It includes accessibility attributes like
role="button"for interactive elements.- The styling classes suggest a responsive design with dark mode support.
The only change in this file is the button text modification, which we've addressed in the previous comment. The rest of the component remains unchanged and seems to follow good practices for modal design and user interaction.
| @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ | |||
| > | |||
| <div class="flex items-center"> | |||
| {{svg-jar "arrow-left" class="w-4 mr-1 fill-current flex-shrink-0"}} | |||
| <span>Back to "{{@activeStep.shortTitle}}"</span> | |||
| <span>Back to current step</span> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider the impact on user experience with this text change.
The change from a dynamic step title to a static "Back to current step" text has both advantages and potential drawbacks:
Pros:
- More consistent across different steps
- Simpler implementation, not relying on dynamic data
Cons:
- Loss of specificity: users no longer see the exact step title they're returning to
- Potential reduction in context for users
While this change simplifies the UI, it's worth considering if the loss of specific step information might impact user navigation or understanding. Consider conducting user testing to ensure this change doesn't negatively affect the user experience.
If you decide to keep this change, ensure that the "current step" is clearly identifiable when users return to it. Alternatively, if you want to maintain specificity without using dynamic text, consider using a more descriptive static text like "Back to your current progress".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
app/components/course-page/current-step-complete-modal.ts (2)
14-24: LGTM: Component class structure is sound, with minor improvement suggestions.The
CurrentStepCompleteModalComponentclass is well-structured, following Ember Octane conventions. The service injection and getter methods are implemented correctly.Consider the following suggestions:
- Add null checks or default values in the getter methods to handle potential undefined states.
- Consider adding JSDoc comments to describe the purpose of the component and its methods.
Would you like me to provide an example of how to implement these suggestions?
1-30: Overall, well-structured component with clear purpose.The
CurrentStepCompleteModalComponentis well-implemented, following Ember Octane patterns and TypeScript best practices. It provides a reusable modal component for indicating step completion in a course page.Suggestions for future improvements:
- Consider adding unit tests to ensure the component behaves correctly under different scenarios.
- If the component grows in complexity, consider splitting the template into a separate file for better separation of concerns.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- app/components/course-page/current-step-complete-modal.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/course-page/current-step-complete-modal.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/course-page/current-step-complete-overlay.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/controllers/course/introduction.ts (1 hunks)
- app/controllers/course/setup.ts (1 hunks)
- app/templates/course/introduction.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/templates/course/setup.hbs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- app/components/course-page/current-step-complete-modal.hbs
- app/components/course-page/current-step-complete-overlay.hbs
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (9)
app/templates/course/setup.hbs (1)
3-5: LGTM: Inner content remains consistent.The inner content, including the
CoursePage::SetupStep::RepositorySetupCardcomponent and its surroundingdiv, remains unchanged. This consistency is good for maintaining the existing functionality and layout of the repository setup card.app/controllers/course/introduction.ts (3)
4-4: LGTM: CoursePageStateService import added correctly.The import statement for CoursePageStateService is properly typed and follows TypeScript best practices.
12-12: LGTM: CoursePageStateService injected correctly.The coursePageState service is properly injected using the @service decorator, and the type is correctly declared. This follows Ember.js best practices and maintains consistency with other service injections in the file.
1-16: Overall, the changes enhance the IntroductionController's functionality.The introduction of the CoursePageStateService and the currentStep getter improves the controller's ability to manage and access the current state of the course. The implementation follows Ember.js and TypeScript best practices, with only minor suggestions for refinement.
These changes appear to be part of a larger feature implementation, likely related to the new CurrentStepCompleteModal and CurrentStepCompleteOverlay components mentioned in the PR title. The additions to this controller will likely facilitate the integration of these new components.
To ensure these changes align with the broader codebase, let's verify the usage of CoursePageStateService:
This script will help us understand how CoursePageStateService is used elsewhere in the codebase and confirm that these changes are consistent with its intended usage.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: CoursePageStateService Integration is Consistent
The introduction of
CoursePageStateServiceand thecurrentStepgetter inIntroductionControlleraligns seamlessly with their extensive usage across the codebase. This ensures consistent state management and enhances the controller's functionality without introducing any conflicts or inconsistencies.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of CoursePageStateService across the codebase # Test: Search for other imports of CoursePageStateService echo "Other imports of CoursePageStateService:" rg --type typescript "import.*CoursePageStateService" # Test: Search for other injections of coursePageState echo "\nOther injections of coursePageState:" rg --type typescript "@service.*coursePageState" # Test: Search for usages of currentStep echo "\nUsages of currentStep:" rg --type typescript "currentStep"Length of output: 483
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify the usage of CoursePageStateService across the codebase using file extensions # Test: Search for other imports of CoursePageStateService in TypeScript files echo "Other imports of CoursePageStateService:" rg "import.*CoursePageStateService" --glob "*.ts" # Test: Search for other injections of coursePageState in TypeScript files echo "\nOther injections of coursePageState:" rg "@service.*coursePageState" --glob "*.ts" # Test: Search for usages of currentStep in TypeScript files echo "\nUsages of currentStep:" rg "currentStep" --glob "*.ts"Length of output: 18047
app/templates/course/introduction.hbs (2)
2-16: LGTM! Verify integration with existing components.The existing content structure is well-preserved within the new
CoursePage::CurrentStepCompleteOverlaycomponent. This approach maintains the current functionality while allowing for the addition of new features related to step completion.To ensure smooth integration, please verify:
- The
WelcomeCardandCreateRepositoryCardcomponents still function as expected within the new structure.- The
@currentStepproperty is correctly propagated to child components if needed.#!/bin/bash # Check for potential conflicts or changes in child components echo "Checking WelcomeCard component:" rg --type hbs "WelcomeCard" app/templates echo "\nChecking CreateRepositoryCard component:" rg --type hbs "CreateRepositoryCard" app/templates echo "\nChecking for @currentStep usage in child components:" rg "@currentStep" app/components/course-page
1-1: LGTM! Verify the CurrentStepCompleteOverlay behavior.The addition of the
CoursePage::CurrentStepCompleteOverlaycomponent aligns with the PR objectives. It wraps the entire content, which suggests it might introduce new functionality related to step completion.To ensure the component is implemented correctly, please verify:
- The component exists and is properly defined.
- The
@currentStepargument is correctly passed and utilized within the component.Also applies to: 17-17
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! The CurrentStepCompleteOverlay component is correctly implemented.
The
CoursePage::CurrentStepCompleteOverlaycomponent exists and properly utilizes the@currentStepargument within its template. All usages of@currentStepacross the codebase are consistent and correctly implemented.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the CurrentStepCompleteOverlay component implementation # Check if the component file exists echo "Checking for component file:" fd --type f "current-step-complete-overlay.ts" app/components/course-page # Check the component's template echo "\nChecking component's template:" fd --type f "current-step-complete-overlay.hbs" app/components/course-page --exec cat {} # Check for @currentStep usage in the component echo "\nChecking @currentStep usage:" rg "@currentStep" app/components/course-pageLength of output: 5352
app/components/course-page/current-step-complete-modal.ts (3)
1-4: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-structured.The imports cover all necessary dependencies for the component, including Ember and Glimmer essentials, as well as custom types and services. The use of
typefor theStepimport is a good TypeScript practice.
5-12: LGTM: Well-defined interface for component arguments.The
Signatureinterface provides clear type definitions for the component's arguments, enhancing type safety. TheElementtype is correctly set toHTMLDivElement, and theArgsstructure includes necessary properties for modal functionality (onCloseandactiveStep).
26-30: LGTM: Proper Glint module augmentation for type-safe template usage.The module augmentation for Glint's registry is correctly implemented. This ensures type-safe usage of the
CurrentStepCompleteModalComponentin templates. The namespaced naming convention ('CoursePage::CurrentStepCompleteModal') is a good practice for maintaining a well-organized component structure.
| <CoursePage::PreviousStepsIncompleteOverlay @currentStep={{this.currentStep}}> | ||
| <div class="w-full pt-8 pb-32 px-3 md:px-6 lg:px-10"> | ||
| <CoursePage::SetupStep::RepositorySetupCard @repository={{@model.activeRepository}} /> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <CoursePage::CurrentStepCompleteOverlay @currentStep={{this.currentStep}}> | ||
| <div class="w-full pt-8 pb-32 px-3 md:px-6 lg:px-10"> | ||
| <CoursePage::SetupStep::RepositorySetupCard @repository={{@model.activeRepository}} /> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </CoursePage::CurrentStepCompleteOverlay> | ||
| </CoursePage::PreviousStepsIncompleteOverlay> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Ensure complete replacement of PreviousStepsIncompleteOverlay.
The verification revealed that PreviousStepsIncompleteOverlay is still present in the following files:
app/templates/course/setup.hbsapp/templates/course/stage/instructions.hbs
Please confirm if these instances should be updated to use CurrentStepCompleteOverlay. Ensuring all references are consistent will maintain the intended user experience and codebase integrity.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the intended component structure and user flow.
The replacement of CoursePage::PreviousStepsIncompleteOverlay with CoursePage::CurrentStepCompleteOverlay suggests a shift in focus from incomplete previous steps to the completion of the current step. This change might affect the user experience and the flow of the course setup process.
However, the new component is nested within the old one, which could lead to unexpected behavior or redundancy. Please confirm if this nested structure is intentional and necessary.
To ensure the components are being used correctly, please run the following script:
This script will help us verify:
- If there are any remaining usages of
PreviousStepsIncompleteOverlaythat need to be updated. - If the
CurrentStepCompleteOverlaycomponent is properly implemented. - If there are any other usages of
CurrentStepCompleteOverlaythat might need to be reviewed for consistency.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage and implementation of the overlay components
# Check for any remaining usage of PreviousStepsIncompleteOverlay
echo "Checking for remaining usage of PreviousStepsIncompleteOverlay:"
rg --type hbs "PreviousStepsIncompleteOverlay"
# Check for the implementation of CurrentStepCompleteOverlay
echo "Checking for the implementation of CurrentStepCompleteOverlay:"
fd --type f --extension ts --extension js "current-step-complete-overlay"
# Check for any other usage of CurrentStepCompleteOverlay
echo "Checking for other usage of CurrentStepCompleteOverlay:"
rg --type hbs "CurrentStepCompleteOverlay"
Length of output: 1392
| @@ -10,6 +10,6 @@ export default class CourseSetupController extends Controller { | |||
| @service declare coursePageState: CoursePageStateService; | |||
|
|
|||
| get currentStep(): Step { | |||
| return this.coursePageState.activeStep as Step; | |||
| return this.coursePageState.currentStep as Step; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Issue Detected: Inconsistent Usage of activeStep
The refactoring from activeStep to currentStep in app/controllers/course/setup.ts is incomplete. Multiple occurrences of activeStep remain throughout the codebase, which may lead to inconsistencies and potential bugs.
- Affected Areas:
app/services/course-page-state.tsapp/components/course-page/*app/routes/course.tsapp/controllers/course/*app/utils/course-page-step-list.ts- And others as identified by the shell script.
Please ensure all instances of activeStep are updated to currentStep to maintain consistency.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify usage of activeStep elsewhere.
The change from activeStep to currentStep looks good. This aligns with the intended modification mentioned in the AI summary.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify if there are any remaining occurrences of activeStep:
This will help identify if any other parts of the codebase still use activeStep and need to be updated for consistency.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining occurrences of 'activeStep' in the codebase
# Search for 'activeStep' in all TypeScript and JavaScript files
rg --type-add 'js:*.{js,ts}' --type js 'activeStep'
# Search for 'currentStep' to compare usage
echo "Occurrences of 'currentStep':"
rg --type-add 'js:*.{js,ts}' --type js 'currentStep'
Length of output: 15262
| get currentStep(): Step { | ||
| return this.coursePageState.currentStep as Step; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider refining the currentStep getter implementation.
While the getter provides a convenient way to access the current step, there are a couple of points to consider:
-
The type assertion
as Stepmight be unnecessary ifcoursePageState.currentStepis already typed asStep. Consider removing it if that's the case. -
There's no null check before accessing
currentStep. This could potentially lead to runtime errors ifcurrentStepis undefined.
Consider refactoring the getter to include a null check and remove the type assertion if it's not needed:
get currentStep(): Step | null {
return this.coursePageState.currentStep ?? null;
}This implementation will return null if currentStep is undefined, preventing potential runtime errors.
| <ProductWalkthroughFeatureSuggestion | ||
| @featureSuggestion={{this.authenticator.currentUser.pendingProductWalkthroughFeatureSuggestion}} | ||
| class="mb-6" | ||
| /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent Usage of mb-6 Class Across Components
The mb-6 class is applied to the ProductWalkthroughFeatureSuggestion component in both catalog.hbs and introduction.hbs. However, similar components like WelcomeCard and CreateRepositoryCard do not consistently use this class.
- Ensure that all instances of
ProductWalkthroughFeatureSuggestionand similar components include themb-6class to maintain consistent spacing and layout throughout the application.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify the visual impact of the added margin.
The addition of the class="mb-6" attribute to the ProductWalkthroughFeatureSuggestion component improves the layout by adding consistent spacing.
Please verify the visual impact of this change:
- Ensure that the added margin doesn't create excessive space or disrupt the overall layout.
- Confirm that this change is consistent with the design system and other similar components.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistent usage of mb-6 class in similar components
echo "Checking for consistent usage of mb-6 class:"
rg --type hbs 'class="[^"]*\bmb-6\b' app/templates
Length of output: 4887
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify consistent usage of mb-6 class in ProductWalkthroughFeatureSuggestion components
echo "Checking ProductWalkthroughFeatureSuggestion component for mb-6 class:"
rg --type hbs '<ProductWalkthroughFeatureSuggestion[^>]*class="[^"]*\bmb-6\b[^"]*"'
Length of output: 319
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
app/components/course-page/step-content.hbs (1)
2-2: Approved: Enhanced conditional rendering logic.The addition of
(not this.shouldHideCompletionNotice)to the conditional statement improves the control over when theCoursePage::CompletedStepNoticecomponent is displayed. This change allows for more flexibility in managing the visibility of the completion notice.Consider extracting the complex condition into a computed property in the component's JavaScript file for improved readability. For example:
@computed('shouldHideCompletionNotice', 'step.completionNoticeMessage') get shouldShowCompletionNotice() { return !this.shouldHideCompletionNotice && this.step.completionNoticeMessage; }Then, you can simplify the template to:
This approach would make the template cleaner and move the logic to the component class, following the principle of separation of concerns.
app/components/course-page/step-content.ts (1)
28-30: LGTM! Consider minor improvements for clarity and extensibility.The new computed property
shouldHideCompletionNoticelooks good and serves its purpose well. It correctly determines whether to hide the completion notice based on the step type.To improve the code further, consider the following suggestions:
- Add a brief comment explaining the purpose of this property.
- For better extensibility, you could use an array of step types. This would make it easier to add or remove step types in the future without changing the logic.
Here's an example of how you could implement these suggestions:
// Step types for which the completion notice should be hidden private readonly HIDE_COMPLETION_NOTICE_STEP_TYPES = ['IntroductionStep', 'SetupStep']; get shouldHideCompletionNotice(): boolean { return this.HIDE_COMPLETION_NOTICE_STEP_TYPES.includes(this.args.step.type); }This approach would make the code more maintainable and easier to understand at a glance.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- app/components/course-page/current-step-complete-modal.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/course-page/step-content.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/course-page/step-content.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- app/components/course-page/current-step-complete-modal.hbs
🧰 Additional context used
Bundle ReportChanges will increase total bundle size by 5.44kB (0.02%) ⬆️. This is within the configured threshold ✅ Detailed changes
|
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
UI Changes
Tests