Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Experimental: Revise flawed expectations about fee estimation in integration tests. #3832

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jonathanknowles
Copy link
Member

  • I have ...

Comments

Issue Number

@jonathanknowles jonathanknowles force-pushed the jonathanknowles/revise-flawed-fee-estimation-expectations branch from fd5deb9 to d5dddb6 Compare April 5, 2023 07:04
The integration test suite is arguably the wrong place to test that fee
estimates should increase or decrease if the outputs of a transaction
are changed.

Moreover, depending on the initial starting conditions and the random
selection performed for each round of fee estimation, it's not
guaranteed that if the outputs for transaction `a` are smaller than the
outputs for transaction `b`, then the fee estimate for transaction `a`
will be lower than the fee estimate for transaction `b`.
@jonathanknowles jonathanknowles force-pushed the jonathanknowles/revise-flawed-fee-estimation-expectations branch from d5dddb6 to a0e4ff0 Compare April 5, 2023 08:25
@jonathanknowles jonathanknowles changed the title Revise flawed expectations about fee estimation in integration tests. Experimental: Revise flawed expectations about fee estimation in integration tests. Apr 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant