Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improving description of timer event specification #4965

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

joewarner
Copy link

Description

This is a documentation change for the specification of timer events - @camunda/tech-writers

When should this change go live?

  • This is a bug fix, security concern, or something that needs urgent release support. (add bug or support label)
  • This is already available but undocumented and should be released within a week. (add available & undocumented label)
  • This is on a specific schedule and the assignee will coordinate a release with the DevEx team. (create draft PR and/or add hold label)
  • This is part of a scheduled alpha or minor. (add alpha or minor label)
  • There is no urgency with this change (add low prio label)

PR Checklist

  • My changes are for the next minor and are in /docs directory (aka /next/).
  • My changes are for an already released minor and are in /versioned_docs directory.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@akeller
Copy link
Member

akeller commented Feb 10, 2025

Hi @joewarner thanks for your PR! I've reached out to the Modeler team internally to confirm some of the details you have here. Shortly after, I'll assign a tech writer to review.

@akeller akeller added the component:modeler Issues related with Modeler project label Feb 10, 2025
@philippfromme philippfromme self-requested a review February 12, 2025 08:53
@philippfromme
Copy link
Contributor

We need someone from the engine team to review this from a technical point of view. I'll let them know.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component:modeler Issues related with Modeler project
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants