-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 137
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HCP multi-pipeline to BIDS #444
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Making some comments for general guidance and trying to alignb with WIP BEP 41 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KHzp-yk8KXvkUIhtN71WU0m4P4kKT9C1yvI-i9_kNeY/edit
con maps
becomes
t maps
becomes
group level as derivatives ?Not sure but it having a group level as derivative nested within the dataset containing the first level may help make privenance a bit clearer (Note this is not part of the BEP)
|
The way I organize things with fitlins is as a collection of sibling derivatives:
|
yeah that makes sense as well: I don't think things need to be nested but having separate BIDS datasets makes sense |
…ntrast maps and stat maps.
Hi @Remi-Gau and @effigies ! I am just not sure about the |
"XYZ-specific metadata" is probably boilerplate from the BEP template that didn't get updated. |
With @cmaumet, we would like to organize a dataset into BIDS but we need more information due to the particular properties of the dataset.
It is a multi-pipeline dataset with statistic and contrast maps at the subject and group-level for 24 different pipelines. These pipelines are named with the following convention:
software-FWHM-number of motion regressors-presence of hrf derivatives
.Here, we propose a first attempt to organize these data as closely as possible to BIDS specifications. The goal is to make it suitable for hosting in the platform public-nEUro.
More information on the dataset are available in the data paper preprint: https://inserm.hal.science/inserm-04356768.
Thanks for your help!