Replies: 3 comments
-
From a practical standpoint, I would advise you to publish it as source: similar experience with bevy_physx crate |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
There was some actual discussion about this on the discord in response to your initial issue opened on the crate reservations repo. https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/743663673393938453/1136020856863207485 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks all - so, looking at the discussion that happened on the Discord channel, and the suggestion from @rlidwka above, I'd be happy to go with |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello,
Just reaching out because I have recently written an ImGui integration for Bevy, and have made the repository available here: https://github.com/jbrd/bevy_imgui.
The next step for the above repository is to make it more generally available for people to try, and to facilitate this, it would be useful to be able to publish the crate. Ideally, in doing so, this repository would assume the bevy_imgui crate name, which is currently reserved. Could someone advise on the process required to take ownership of one of these reserved crate names?
Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions