Skip to content

Conversation

@braydencstratusadv
Copy link
Collaborator

This addresses and fixes issues from first attempt raised in #1140

closes #1140

Copy link
Collaborator

@bferguso bferguso left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall looks good, but I think we should make that field datatype match the other "modified by" fields in that resource model.

other_maps_modified_by: ResourceInstanceListValue; // resource-instance-list (contributor)
other_maps_map_name: StringValue;
other_maps_map_scale: StringValue;
other_maps_modified_by: ResourceInstanceListValue;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should be a StringValue not ResourceInstanceListValue based on the graph datatype. Wondering if we should make this non-localized string datatype to match the other "modified_by" values in that resource model.

"searchDsl": "",
"searchString": ""
},
"datatype": "string",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wondering if this should be a non-localized-string to match the other fields in this model.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make node names unique and clear for each resource model

3 participants