Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Spark operator default to encrypted gp3 PVs #674

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 11, 2024

Conversation

alanty
Copy link
Contributor

@alanty alanty commented Oct 10, 2024

What does this PR do?

Adding a storage class for encrypted gp3 volumes and making it the default, then updating the addons to use that gp3 storage class for PVCs.

Motivation

bringing parity between the ipv4 and ipv6 versions of the spark operator blueprint

More

  • Yes, I have tested the PR using my local account setup (Provide any test evidence report under Additional Notes)
  • Mandatory for new blueprints. Yes, I have added a example to support my blueprint PR
  • Mandatory for new blueprints. Yes, I have updated the website/docs or website/blog section for this feature
  • Yes, I ran pre-commit run -a with this PR. Link for installing pre-commit locally

For Moderators

  • E2E Test successfully complete before merge?

@alanty alanty changed the title [feature] Spark operator defatul to encrypted gp3 PVs feat: Spark operator defatul to encrypted gp3 PVs Oct 10, 2024
@alanty alanty changed the title feat: Spark operator defatul to encrypted gp3 PVs feat: Spark operator default to encrypted gp3 PVs Oct 11, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@vara-bonthu vara-bonthu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@vara-bonthu vara-bonthu merged commit a95ed70 into awslabs:main Oct 11, 2024
41 of 42 checks passed
@alanty alanty deleted the spark-gp3-storage branch February 5, 2025 21:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants