Skip to content

fix t2.nano usage #964

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 14, 2025
Merged

fix t2.nano usage #964

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 14, 2025

Conversation

GarrettBeatty
Copy link
Contributor

@GarrettBeatty GarrettBeatty commented Jul 12, 2025

Issue #, if available: Update tests to use t3.micro free tier

it looks like there was a recent change where t3.micro is free tier now. so this updates the test to select "yes" for free tier so that t3.micro is used ( i couldnt find any news/docs on this change though so maybe im missing something)

below is query result i got when doing describe instances in us-west-2

InstanceType FreeTierEligible Architecture CPU Cores Memory (MiB)
------------ ---------------- ------------ --------- ------------
t2.2xlarge              False x86_64               8        32768
t3.xlarge               False x86_64               2        16384
t3.2xlarge              False x86_64               4        32768
t2.large                False x86_64               2         8192
t3.medium               False x86_64               1         4096
t3.large                False x86_64               1         8192
t2.micro                False i386, x86_64         1         1024
t3.micro                 True x86_64               1         1024
t3.nano                 False x86_64               1          512
t2.medium               False i386, x86_64         2         4096
t2.small                False i386, x86_64         1         2048
t3.small                 True x86_64               1         2048
t2.xlarge               False x86_64               4        16384
t2.nano                 False i386, x86_64         1          512

Description of changes:

  1. use t3 micro.
  • testing*
    im not able to test in my personal isengard account because my account still shows t2.nano as free tier (idk why)

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@GarrettBeatty GarrettBeatty changed the title fix t2.micro usage fix t2.nano usage Jul 12, 2025
@GarrettBeatty GarrettBeatty marked this pull request as ready for review July 12, 2025 14:54
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 12, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 62.11%. Comparing base (520a18b) to head (37fa9d2).
Report is 5 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #964   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   62.11%   62.11%           
=======================================
  Files         294      294           
  Lines       10813    10813           
  Branches     1616     1616           
=======================================
  Hits         6717     6717           
  Misses       3494     3494           
  Partials      602      602           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@GarrettBeatty GarrettBeatty requested a review from philasmar July 14, 2025 14:15
@GarrettBeatty GarrettBeatty added the Release Not Needed Add this label if a PR does not need to be released. label Jul 14, 2025
@GarrettBeatty GarrettBeatty merged commit a2ff878 into dev Jul 14, 2025
15 of 18 checks passed
@GarrettBeatty GarrettBeatty deleted the gcbeatty/freetier branch July 14, 2025 21:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Release Not Needed Add this label if a PR does not need to be released.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants