Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: error on non-existent extra from lock file #10925

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mkniewallner
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Alternative to #10869 which follows the suggestion, in #10869 (comment), to validate extras from the lock file instead of pyproject.toml.

Test Plan

Snapshot tests.

@@ -625,6 +625,11 @@ impl Lock {
})
}

/// Returns the package whose name matches [`PackageName`].
pub fn find_package(&self, name: &PackageName) -> Option<&Package> {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We could make it find_packages instead to iterate once and retrieve the packages we are interested in.

Comment on lines +152 to +156
#[error("Extra `{0}` is not defined in the project's `optional-dependencies` table")]
MissingExtraProject(ExtraName),

#[error("Extra `{0}` is not defined in any project's `optional-dependencies` table")]
MissingExtraWorkspace(ExtraName),
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wording could probably be adapted here, as the check happens at lock file level, but not sure exactly how we would want to phrase this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant