Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for WASILibc #2671
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add support for WASILibc #2671
Changes from 8 commits
70ff245
66e3f0e
9170712
1958d91
4cfee57
e5ccda5
9fe470a
85f140e
4ee91c6
fdd622f
b1b5d7f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This condition should probably be persisted across almost any library target that depends on
NIO
which also depends onNIOCore
._NIOConcurrency
,NIOFoundationCompat
,NIOWebSocket
,NIOTLS
appear to be the other places.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we can merge a PR that silently disables these primitives on WASI without being extremely confident that we'll never need them. Is there any way we can replace this with a feature-detection on threading?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My general preference here would be that the APIs here are present, they just end up failing when actually used in WASI. That would mean hardcoding the syscall value on WASI, or deliberately using a spoiler value. That note applies to the rest of this file.