Skip to content

HDFS-17789. Add NormalUnderReplBlocksCount and BadlyDistributedBlocksCount to getStats() NN RPC #7695

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: trunk
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

aswinmprabhu
Copy link
Contributor

Description of PR

At LinkedIn, we use the stats from the getStats() NN RPC call to evaluate safety checks that ensure that various maintenance ops are safe to run.

Due to a migration we are undertaking, the badly distributed block count is very high for the cluster undergoing migration. This is not a safety problem. However, to distinguish it from the actual low redundancy block count, we need both these values to be available from the getStats() RPC. The current low redundancy blocks count value available is the sum of all the different types of low redundancy blocks, including normal low redundancy blocks and badly distributed blocks.

This PR adds these 2 values separately to the array returned by getStats() RPC.

How was this patch tested?

Trivial change. It has been running in our prod cluster for a bit now.
Build passes:

[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time:  42:50 min
[INFO] Finished at: 2025-05-19T14:51:09+05:30
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------

For code changes:

  • Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id (e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
  • Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
  • If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
  • If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE, LICENSE-binary, NOTICE-binary files?

@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Logfile Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 25s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 codespell 0m 1s codespell was not available.
+0 🆗 detsecrets 0m 1s detect-secrets was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌ test4tests 0m 0s The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
_ trunk Compile Tests _
+0 🆗 mvndep 6m 3s Maven dependency ordering for branch
+1 💚 mvninstall 20m 3s trunk passed
+1 💚 compile 3m 8s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 compile 2m 51s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 47s trunk passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 1m 29s trunk passed
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 13s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 51s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚 spotbugs 3m 19s trunk passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 21m 51s branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+0 🆗 mvndep 0m 22s Maven dependency ordering for patch
+1 💚 mvninstall 1m 6s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 3m 14s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javac 3m 14s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 2m 59s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚 javac 2m 59s the patch passed
+1 💚 blanks 0m 0s The patch has no blanks issues.
-0 ⚠️ checkstyle 0m 42s /results-checkstyle-hadoop-hdfs-project.txt hadoop-hdfs-project: The patch generated 1 new + 169 unchanged - 0 fixed = 170 total (was 169)
+1 💚 mvnsite 1m 14s the patch passed
-1 ❌ javadoc 0m 25s /results-javadoc-javadoc-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-client-jdkUbuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04.txt hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-client-jdkUbuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04 with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04 generated 4 new + 1161 unchanged - 0 fixed = 1165 total (was 1161)
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 28s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚 spotbugs 3m 13s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 23m 53s patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 2m 9s hadoop-hdfs-client in the patch passed.
+1 💚 unit 11m 5s hadoop-hdfs in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 22s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
115m 59s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.49 ServerAPI=1.49 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7695/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #7695
Optional Tests dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets
uname Linux 64672e9defb2 5.15.0-136-generic #147-Ubuntu SMP Sat Mar 15 15:53:30 UTC 2025 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision trunk / 20f5e88
Default Java Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
Multi-JDK versions /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7695/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 1158 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-client hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U: hadoop-hdfs-project
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7695/1/console
versions git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants