Improved performance of UriParser#extractScheme #614
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
UriParser#extractSchemeis often called, so performance of this method matters.Here is a performance improvement that avoids many String concatenation.
Here are the JMH results
Before
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
UriParserBenchmark.extractScheme thrpt 25 86408837,361 ▒ 3001538,949 ops/s
After
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
UriParserBenchmark.extractScheme thrpt 25 159851495,299 ▒ 2540759,982 ops/s
JMH results show a 85% performance improvement of the method
Also attached a flame graph of
FileObject#getChildren()using JFR/JMC showing that most of the time is spent in theextractSchememethod