Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Implementation of Iterative Feedback Loop for Translation Improvement #38

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

arthasking123
Copy link

Context

What is the purpose of this PR? Is it to

  • add a new feature
  • fix a bug
  • update tests and/or documentation
  • other (please add here)

Please link to any issues this PR addresses.
#17

Changelog

What are the changes made in this PR?
Add iteration inplementation for translation agent

Test plan

Please make sure to do each of the following if applicable to your PR. (If you're not sure about any one of these just ask and we will happily help.)

  • run pre-commit hooks and linters (make sure you've first installed via pre-commit install)
  • add unit tests for any new functionality
  • update docstrings for any new or updated methods or classes
  • run unit tests via pytest tests
  • include relevant commands and any other artifacts in this summary (eval results, etc.)

@arthasking123 arthasking123 changed the title #17 Add iteration inplementation for translation agent #17 Jul 18, 2024
@arthasking123 arthasking123 changed the title Add iteration inplementation for translation agent #17 Add Implementation of Iterative Feedback Loop for Translation Improvement Jul 18, 2024
@methanet
Copy link
Collaborator

@arthasking123 Thanks for the code, we'll review. Do you have any qualitative assessments or just examples of this feature performance in comparison to the original?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants