Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: Correct grammar in Task class method description #141

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2024

Conversation

vinayakrana
Copy link
Contributor

Corrected the grammatical issue in the sentence describing the methods of The Task class. Specifically, added the missing preposition "to" in the phrase "applying processing operations to the data" to improve readability and correctness.

📝 Description

Corrected a grammatical error in the Task class method description in the documentation. Specifically, added the missing preposition "to" in the phrase "applying processing operations to the data". This change improves the clarity and grammatical accuracy of the documentation.

✅ Checklist before requesting a review

(See the contributing guide for more details on these steps.)

  • I have installed developer dependencies with pip install -r requirements/requirements.dev.txt and running pre-commit install (or alternatively, manually running ruff format before commiting)

If changing or adding source code:

  • tests are included and are passing (run pytest).
  • documentation is included or updated as relevant, including docstrings.

If changing or adding documentation:

  • docs build successfully (jupyter-book build docs --all) and the changes look good from a manual inspection of the HTML in docs/_build/html/.

Corrected the grammatical issue in the sentence describing the methods of The Task class. Specifically, added the missing preposition "to" in the phrase "applying processing operations to the data" to improve readability and correctness.
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@davidwilby
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks @vinayakrana this is great!

@all-contributors please add @vinayakrana for doc

@davidwilby davidwilby merged commit 4e77a7a into alan-turing-institute:main Dec 20, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

@davidwilby

I've put up a pull request to add @vinayakrana! 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants