Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Line Item Rate Validation Error #648

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

TiagoAzevedo03
Copy link

@TiagoAzevedo03 TiagoAzevedo03 commented Mar 19, 2025

Resolves #637

Bug Fixes

Updated the item rate input validation to ensure that only values inside JavaScript limits are accepted. This fix ensures that the application does not crash when inserting out of limits inputs.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced unit price input validation by enforcing an upper limit to prevent excessive values, ensuring clearer error messages for out-of-range entries.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 19, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the validation logic for the unitPrice field in lib/schemas.ts. In addition to the existing minimum value check, a new constraint is appended to ensure the unitPrice does not exceed JavaScript's Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER. No changes were made to exported entities.

Changes

File Change Summary
lib/schemas.ts Enhanced the unitPrice validator by appending .lte(Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER, { message: "Must be ≤ 9007199254740991" }) to enforce a maximum safe integer limit.

Sequence Diagram(s)

Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant C as Client
    participant V as Validator
    C->>V: Submit unitPrice value
    V->>V: Check if value > 0
    alt value > 0
        V->>V: Check if value ≤ MAX_SAFE_INTEGER
        alt within range
            V-->>C: Validation Success
        else
            V-->>C: Error: "Must be ≤ 9007199254740991"
        end
    else
        V-->>C: Error: "Must be a number greater than 0"
    end

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Validate unitPrice within safe numeric limits [#637]

Possibly related PRs

Poem

I’m a bouncy rabbit of code so clear,
Hopping through validations without any fear.
I add a check to keep numbers in line,
Ensuring our data stays safe and fine.
With a twitch and a hop, I celebrate this day,
For a fix that keeps our bugs at bay!

Tip

⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments. This experimental feature enhances review discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments.
    - To enable this feature, set early_access to true under in the settings.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 852e381 and 9fe37bd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • lib/schemas.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
lib/schemas.ts (1)

57-58: Excellent bug fix for preventing numerical overflow errors!

This change appropriately adds an upper limit validation to the unitPrice field, preventing JavaScript calculation errors that could occur when values exceed Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER (9,007,199,254,740,991). The implementation:

  1. Preserves the existing minimum value validation
  2. Adds a clear error message showing the maximum allowed value
  3. Aligns with issue [BUG] - MAX SAFE CHECK IF NOT HANDLED PROPERLY #637 mentioned in the PR objectives

The fix will prevent application crashes when users attempt to input extremely large values, enhancing application stability.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 19, 2025

@TiagoAzevedo03 is attempting to deploy a commit to the al1abb-team Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] - MAX SAFE CHECK IF NOT HANDLED PROPERLY
1 participant