Adapt message arguments passing to process controller

[unkcpz]

Changes required after aiidateam/plumpy#301 and aiidateam/plumpy#291

For the rpc call of process.kill and process.pause, the passed in argument name is changed from msg to msg_text. Same for kill_processes and pause_processes of process controller.
Meanwhile, when calling _perform_actions the action is passed as a callable that takes no argument, it then requires the callable should be constructed with its arguments using functools.partial before hands. This increase the readability by makes the arguments stay together with the function itself where originally the arguments passed to callable is separated from other arguments for _perform_action itself.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 84.61538% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 77.99%. Comparing base (15b5caf) to head (35a0204).
Report is 30 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/aiida/engine/processes/functions.py	50.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/aiida/engine/runners.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6668      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.99%   77.99%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         563      563              
  Lines       41761    41762       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits        32567    32570       +3     
+ Misses       9194     9192       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[khsrali]

Thanks a lot @unkcpz , I have just one comment.

[khsrali]

@unkcpz thanks a lot! changes makes sense.
As agreed let's wait for a plumpy release before merging this. and we have to remember to remove the commit hook for plumpy so to pin the to-be-released version.

[agoscinski]

Looks okay, just needs to be rebased after plumpy release

[unkcpz]

@khsrali I rebase with the main branch of plumpy, all CI code tests are passed. We can make a release for plumpy.

[unkcpz]

Hi @khsrali, I update plumpy version, should all good now. Can you have another look?

[unkcpz]

I'll merge this now, it blocks my work on #6675. The changes here are mostly variable names of function call.
In #6675, there are other engine changes that are hard to debug (I was struggle on things are working on python3.12 but not python3.9) I want to isolate the changes from this PR.

[khsrali]

Thanks @unkcpz