-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Scd4x 3x issue #658
Open
tyeth
wants to merge
7
commits into
adafruit:main
Choose a base branch
from
tyeth:scd-issue
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Scd4x 3x issue #658
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
736d1ba
Fix SCD4x and SCD30 (alreadyRecentlyRead) + MetroS3 debug target
tyeth cdb4d02
Swap Previous Period helper functions to ulong
tyeth b4c83b8
Set SCD4x to not read until T+5s
tyeth 2052621
Switch to using sensor period for T-5sec delay (pollPeriod begin arg)
tyeth 7104bf6
Switch SCD30 to use read() instead of getEvent()
tyeth 8eab892
clang format
tyeth 7ee24c3
clang again
tyeth File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the reasoning for the function header to change from
long
toulong
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The previous poll period (periodPrv) is stored in the backing field as a long, and initially is set to 24hours ago (negative), but the logic check was shortcutting due to the unsigned long getter and setter methods (achieving the initial read change that introduced it).
Now that I've got a driver that wants update to only be called 5seconds after driver init/begin, which uses the sensor poll period taken away from millis +5secs, we need a way of the previous poll period getter+setter taking negative numbers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This makes sense to me as
millis()
returns aulong
and you want to prevent it from underflowing.Would we want to change everything within
I2C.cpp/I2C_Driver
toulong
while we're at it?If we are going to change something, let's ensure we have matching function signatures everywhere.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Be careful that you don't make a change that breaks backward compatibility. Could code that uses the current data type break if the type is re-defined?