Conversation
| method_macro!(Options, options); | ||
| method_macro!(Trace, trace); | ||
| method_macro!(Patch, patch); | ||
| method_macro!(All, all); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This will almost certainly be easier with a new macro creator rather than trying to retro-fit method_macro!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is making a custom http server and defining any a way or is there a better way? @robjtede
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What it would need to generate would be similar to the other macros (an HttpServiceFactory implementation) except without adding any method guards to the route.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am sorry but I am not sure if I understand @robjtede
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do I need to define it here?
Or in service.rs in actix-http.
Pardon me for asking so many questions btw
| #[route("/single", method = "ALL")] | ||
| async fn index() -> String { | ||
| "Hello Single!".to_owned() | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we were trying to aim more so for the dedicated macro style:
#[any("/path")]
async handler() {
// ...
robjtede
added
A-web-codegen
2 participants
PR Type
It's a draft PR for progress checking DRAFT PRPR_TYPE
PR Checklist
Overview