Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Addon: [1.7.65] - Optimize for memory allocation. #674

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2025
Merged

Addon: [1.7.65] - Optimize for memory allocation. #674

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2025

Conversation

Xian55
Copy link
Owner

@Xian55 Xian55 commented Feb 5, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Key Changes:

  • Core: AddonBits: SoftInteract_Enabled
  • Addon: Significantly reduced per frame memory allocation.
  • Addon: Per frame string concatenation eliminated.
  • Addon: There are still room for improvement as there still small allocations scattered in the code.
  • Addon: UnitLevelSafe against +10 level higher mobs.

@Xian55
Addon: 1.7.65: Optimize for memory allocation.
23d6436 
Core: AddonBits: SoftInteract_Enabled
@Xian55 Xian55 added bugfix This pull request fixes an issue. refactor This ticket concerns the possible simplification of code/data. enhancement This pull request implements a new feature. labels Feb 5, 2025
@Xian55 Xian55 merged commit 9bea201 into dev Feb 5, 2025
1 check passed
@Xian55 Xian55 deleted the feature/addon/1.7.65 branch February 5, 2025 23:34
@Xian55 Xian55 changed the title Addon: [1.7.65] - Optimize for memory allocation. Core: AddonBits: SoftInteract_Enabled Addon: [1.7.65] - Optimize for memory allocation. Feb 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bugfix This pull request fixes an issue. enhancement This pull request implements a new feature. refactor This ticket concerns the possible simplification of code/data.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@Xian55