Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Checking user understanding of shared identity #78

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dmarti
Copy link

@dmarti dmarti commented Jan 13, 2022

Add IEE role in surveys of users to check that they understand common identity.

(It would be impractical to leave this to the browser and site author, especially in cases where the browser and site author have a business relationship that would be influenced by FPS validity or invalidity.)

Refs #43 #48 #64 #76

Add IEE role in surveys of users to check that they understand
common identity.

(It would be impractical to leave this to the browser and site
author, especially in cases where the browser and site author
have a business relationship that would be influenced by FPS
validity or invalidity.)

Refs WICG#43 WICG#48 WICG#64 WICG#76
@dmarti dmarti added the ua_policy Issues related to UA Policy label Jan 14, 2022
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ For each element of the First Party Set policy, we propose an enforcement method
<tr>
<td>A group identity that is easily discoverable by a users </td>
<td>UI treatment (and co-branding in some cases)<sup>2</sup> </td>
<td>None (solely the browser's and site author's responsibility)</td>
<td>Conduct user surveys to determine if common identity is understandable to users</td>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dmarti - Do you see this being performed for (a) Every set submission/acceptance, (b) On sets flagged by users and civil society, or (b) Periodically, outside of the set validation process, with the aim of improving criteria/guidance provided in the policy document.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@krgovind Added a note on this in a follow-up commit. This probably would not need to happen for every set, but for (b) on some randomly selected sets to calibrate the survey, and as part of handling reports of invalid sets.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ua_policy Issues related to UA Policy
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants