Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ruff compliance for D401. #5687

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Jan 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

tkknight
Copy link
Contributor

@tkknight tkknight commented Jan 10, 2024

🚀 Pull Request

Description

PR solely for fixing D401: First line of docstring should be in imperative mood: ...

Continues work of #5625.


Consult Iris pull request check list

@tkknight tkknight mentioned this pull request Jan 10, 2024
13 tasks
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (54f9e98) 89.69% compared to head (def1137) 89.69%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5687   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.69%   89.69%           
=======================================
  Files          90       90           
  Lines       22809    22809           
  Branches     5440     5440           
=======================================
  Hits        20458    20458           
  Misses       1618     1618           
  Partials      733      733           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

* upstream/main:
  ruff compliance for D205. (SciTools#5681)
  Added whatsnew to warnings PR (SciTools#5696)
  Removed use of catch_warnings (SciTools#5685)
  Better documentation for Cube names in curl (SciTools#5680)
  fix typo (SciTools#5689)
  Make further topics obviously different (SciTools#5684)
  [pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate (SciTools#5682)
…D401_imperative_mood

* 'D401_imperative_mood' of github.com:tkknight/iris:
@tkknight tkknight marked this pull request as ready for review January 15, 2024 11:32
@bjlittle bjlittle self-assigned this Jan 18, 2024
Copy link
Member

@bjlittle bjlittle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tkknight Awesome, thanks 🚀

Just a couple of minor comments to service, then we can bank this 👍

lib/iris/coords.py Show resolved Hide resolved
lib/iris/fileformats/_ff.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
setup.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@bjlittle bjlittle merged commit 67bb5ae into SciTools:main Jan 18, 2024
17 checks passed
@tkknight tkknight deleted the D401_imperative_mood branch January 18, 2024 14:46
tkknight added a commit to tkknight/iris that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2024
* upstream/main:
  ruff compliance for D401. (SciTools#5687)
  Bump actions/cache from 3 to 4 (SciTools#5703)
tkknight added a commit to tkknight/iris that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2024
* upstream/main: (26 commits)
  Bump scitools/workflows from 2023.12.1 to 2024.01.0 (SciTools#5710)
  Faster trivial equality checks for coordinates and arrays (SciTools#5691)
  Make the Coord.cell method lazy (SciTools#5693)
  Re-write `pearsonr` to use `Resolve` (SciTools#5638)
  ruff compliance for D401. (SciTools#5687)
  Bump actions/cache from 3 to 4 (SciTools#5703)
  update rtd ubuntu and mambaforge (SciTools#5702)
  [pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate (SciTools#5699)
  ruff compliance for D205. (SciTools#5681)
  Added whatsnew to warnings PR (SciTools#5696)
  Removed use of catch_warnings (SciTools#5685)
  Better documentation for Cube names in curl (SciTools#5680)
  fix typo (SciTools#5689)
  Make further topics obviously different (SciTools#5684)
  [pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate (SciTools#5682)
  ruff complliance for D100. (SciTools#5678)
  move tests.pp to tests.__init__ (SciTools#5679)
  ruff compliance for D417, D106 (SciTools#5677)
  ruff compliance for D200. (SciTools#5675)
  ruff compliance for D106. (SciTools#5676)
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants