-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 283
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add citation file and validating GHA #5483
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5483 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 89.69% 89.69%
=======================================
Files 90 90
Lines 22807 22807
Branches 5441 5441
=======================================
Hits 20456 20456
Misses 1618 1618
Partials 733 733 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Not sure if this helps, but I just stumbled on some advice elsewhere, which seems to suggest it's really easy to automate this for each release. I'm not confident that I personally understand the issues here. But, might this be helpful ?? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your patience, @HGWright! Here is your long-awaited review
…n-file * 'citation-file' of github.com:HGWright/iris: added - name: to CITATION.cff Merge commit
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Super, LGTM!
🚀 Pull Request
Description
This adds a CITATION.cff file and a GitHub Action to validate the CITATION.cff file.
I messed up the rebase somehow on #5161 and not the PR is very polluted, so I have remade the changes here and will capture the conversation that took place there at the bottom of this.
@bjlittle I have added you as the reviewer as you were also the reviewer for the previous PR.
I am also linking to #5453 and #4679 as they were mentioned in the original PR.
Closes #5118
The original PR comment:
Suggestion to add GHA:
Original review comments:
The comments that lead to the current approach: