fix: Fix Svace issue with ignored check

[o-kopysov]

Pull Request

Description

Fix for the Svace issue with ignored check for mkdir()

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Code cleanup/refactoring
• Documentation update
• This change requires a documentation update
• CI system update
• Test Coverage update

Checklist:

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• My code meets the required code coverage for lines (90% and above)
• My code meets the required code coverage for branches (80% and above)
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 25.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 92.93%. Comparing base (57c5e2b) to head (561e048).

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/main/java/com/lpvs/util/LPVSFileUtil.java	25.00%	2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #572      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     93.08%   92.93%   -0.16%     
  Complexity      545      545              
============================================
  Files            48       48              
  Lines          1822     1825       +3     
  Branches        221      222       +1     
============================================
  Hits           1696     1696              
- Misses           59       61       +2     
- Partials         67       68       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[t-naumenko]

Good job!

[o-konoval]

LGTM

[m-rudyk]

Approved.