Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bandi criteria #22

Open
wants to merge 16 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Bandi criteria #22

wants to merge 16 commits into from

Conversation

folix-01
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@folix-01 folix-01 requested a review from cekk January 20, 2025 16:49
redturtle/bandi/querymodifiers/bandi_state.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
redturtle/bandi/vocabularies.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -36,3 +36,12 @@ msgstr "Destinatari bando"
#: Custom bandi indexes
msgid "scadenza_bando"
msgstr "Scadenza bando"

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why in plone domain? There is a redturtle.bandi domain.

Also: add "scheduled" state label

Copy link
Member Author

@folix-01 folix-01 Jan 21, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in the redturtle.bandi.po it should be removed after update_locale script run so as there is no explicit entry in the code

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member Author

@folix-01 folix-01 Jan 22, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mamico is it our new official approach? Because i feel more confident to use current approach like we use in the redturtle.prenotazioni. Did you already try it? Does edited script behaves fine in the local installations on different platforms?

I would continue to use this approach. If after some time the new one will approve the reliability, we can apply it

@folix-01 folix-01 requested a review from cekk January 21, 2025 16:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants